Jump to content

For those still complaining about Star..


Roundybout

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Bangarang said:

What does Star have to do with anything you just posted?

 

4 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

Wait where is Star mentioned again?

 

Brought in to eat blockers so the linebackers could do their jobs? What people have said all along?

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BillsEnthusiast said:

 

 

Brought in to eat blockers so the linebackers could do their jobs? What people have said all along?

 

And this shows that how?  

 

What it shows me is Milano and Edmunds are very good LBers. 

 

But hey glad we paid a Ton to a guy to eat up blocks. 

 

Phillips does it too and actually gets push and is paid 1/10th of Star 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MAJBobby said:

 

And this shows that how?  

 

What it shows me is Milano and Edmunds are very good LBers. 

 

But hey glad we paid a Ton to a guy to eat up blocks. 

 

Phillips does it too and actually gets push and is paid 1/10th of Star 

 

Figures you can't change some people's opinions. Oh well. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MAJBobby said:

 

And this shows that how?  

 

What it shows me is Milano and Edmunds are very good LBers. 

 

But hey glad we paid a Ton to a guy to eat up blocks. 

 

Phillips does it too and actually gets push and is paid 1/10th of Star 

 

They are good LBs, but for them to showcase their skills on a consistent basis, it starts up front. That is a testament to the line as a whole, not just Star. Hughes, Murphy, and Lawson have all played well, and so have the tackles. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillsEnthusiast said:

 

Figures you can't change some people's opinions. Oh well. 

 

Nothing in this post gives me ANY indication how Star is doing. What is his PFF grade. His Disruptive Grade. Where is he ranking in all other DTs. 

 

Posting Milano and Edmunds stuff does nothing for me (Specially when this is WHY multiple picks where given up for Edmunds)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

And this shows that how?  

 

What it shows me is Milano and Edmunds are very good LBers. 

 

But hey glad we paid a Ton to a guy to eat up blocks. 

 

Phillips does it too and actually gets push and is paid 1/10th of Star 

Or you could watch him and realize this is exactly what is happening rather than criticizing something that is provable on tape. He's also doing the second part of the reason for signing him well, stuffing up the middle on pass plays so Hughes and Murphy can use their formidable speed rushing skills to get around the corner but not have the QB step up into a huge open pocket and escape that rush like what was happening the last couple years.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Drunken Pygmy Goat said:

 

They are good LBs, but for them to showcase their skills on a consistent basis, it starts up front. That is a testament to the line as a whole, not just Star. Hughes, Murphy, and Lawson have all played well, and so have the tackles. 

 

So the title is misleading trying to fit a specific agenda. Got it 

Just now, Mike in Syracuse said:

LB's are way less good when they have offensive linemen in their face.

 

Our LB's are playing well because our DT's are keeping them clean.    That's how NFL defenses work.

 

Really that is how NFL defenses work. You mean Only in the NFL If an OL gets out to a LBer he is ineffective?

 

i see Edmunds and Milano taking on Untouched OL every game, but that cant be they would be ineffective right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

And this shows that how?  

 

What it shows me is Milano and Edmunds are very good LBers. 

 

But hey glad we paid a Ton to a guy to eat up blocks. 

 

Phillips does it too and actually gets push and is paid 1/10th of Star 

 

Oh. You don't know how football works. That explains that.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MAJBobby said:

 

So the title is misleading trying to fit a specific agenda. Got it 

 

Look who's talking about agendas

3 minutes ago, Bangarang said:

 

You've literally provided no evidence to show why it should.

 

Correlation. When Star takes 2 blockers up, then the backers can go attack. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'd have to be a real nincompoop to not believe that Star is a contributing reason to allowing our defensive players the freedom to disrupt and make plays.

 

The whole reason why we brought him in wasn't to make sacks or lots of tackles but to help collapse the pocket in pass rushing situations and eat up blockers for our playmakers to do what they do.  And that is exactly what they've done thanks in part to Star.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...