Jump to content

Trade for Sam Bradford?


GoodHands15

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. Quick thought to think.

 

Fiscally irrisponsibe to trade for Sam Bradford since JA on rookie deal?

 

SB>NP

SB$=AJM$

SbContractLength=1

 

Plus we could always sell Bradford if someone else needs to buy him.

 

Bad idea?

 

I get Nate Peterman knows x’s and o’s but I’d like to think Bradford could teach.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rochesterfan said:

Not something I want to see.  Bradford is not good and very expensive.  Rather see a cheap deal for Moore  than see them waste a pick and money on Bradford.

 

Huge No Thanks!!

 

Moore is refusing try-outs.  Rumor from some of the rag-sites on the Internets today is that his arm is shot. 

 

https://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/matt_moore_turns_down_titans_workout/s1_14819_27356009

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, GoodHands15 said:

Hey guys. Quick thought to think.

 

Fiscally irrisponsibe to trade for Sam Bradford since JA on rookie deal?

 

SB>NP

SB$=AJM$

SbContractLength=1

 

Plus we could always sell Bradford if someone else needs to buy him.

 

Bad idea?

 

I get Nate Peterman knows x’s and o’s but I’d like to think Bradford could teach.

teach what?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

We do need a legit backup QB.  Peterman can’t be anything other than a #3 QB.  A guy like Matt Moore is probably a better and less expensive option though.  

Matt Moore just turned down tryouts with the 49ers and Titans. Word is his arm is shot.

 

Bradford is a terrible idea. Give up a pick+ Bad play+expensive= 2 games til hurt.

 

Right now if anyone other than Josh Allen is taking snaps from center we are in deep deep trouble and thats not changing,with anyone thats currently unsigned.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, GoodHands15 said:

Hey guys. Quick thought to think.

 

Fiscally irrisponsibe to trade for Sam Bradford since JA on rookie deal?

 

SB>NP

SB$=AJM$

SbContractLength=1

 

Plus we could always sell Bradford if someone else needs to buy him.

 

Bad idea?

 

I get Nate Peterman knows x’s and o’s but I’d like to think Bradford could teach.

 

Bradford's not a car.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, GoodHands15 said:

Hey guys. Quick thought to think.

 

Fiscally irrisponsibe to trade for Sam Bradford since JA on rookie deal?

 

SB>NP

SB$=AJM$

SbContractLength=1

 

Plus we could always sell Bradford if someone else needs to buy him.

 

Bad idea?

 

I get Nate Peterman knows x’s and o’s but I’d like to think Bradford could teach.

No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...