Hapless Bills Fan Posted August 31, 2018 Share Posted August 31, 2018 [This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A better title will help the community find information faster and make your topic more likely to be read. The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 In would keep Ray-Ray over Coleman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerJ Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 6 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...just askin' bud.....could you IR him with designation to return, which I believe would be week 6?.....if Coleman has some perceived value but being "late to the party", see what he can do until Ray-Ray can return?...... I was thinking the rule was changed last year. You don't have to designate a player to return. Teams are allowed to activate any player who had been IRed. They can only do it once, however. I thought it was the Bills who proposed this rule change to the committee. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 5 minutes ago, TigerJ said: I was thinking the rule was changed last year. You don't have to designate a player to return. Teams are allowed to activate any player who had been IRed. They can only do it once, however. I thought it was the Bills who proposed this rule change to the committee. ....yes you are correct...... he has to be on the final 53 as the first step..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts