Jump to content

Would you take this bet on Buffalo sports?


Recommended Posts

I'd easily take that $200...

We know the Bills aren't winning the Super Bowl, let alone the AFC East crown, so the only way I'd be at risk of losing $10,000 would be if the Sabres somehow go from dead last in the league to Championship in one shot.

I guess it's possible, but would any non-homer bet the Browns would go from dead last in the league to winning the Super Bowl this year? 

Hell, even though I'd only make $200, I'd take that bet with 50 separate people & still feel safe. Then I'd come away with $10,000 anyway, even if I did just risk paying $500k 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

nope.  9 straight division wins.

 

That's actually not true. They are called 9 time AFC East Champions. Just as the 90's Bills are always referred to as having won 5 out of 6 AFC East championships. 

Hell, just google any articles that discuss those teams, or the Bills franchise achievements as a whole. Here's just the Wikipedia page of the Bills - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_Bills

It even notes "Conference Championships," and "Division Championships" to go along with League Championships. In record books, in documentaries, in discussion, and on banners, division & conference championships are certainly referred to as "Championships," not "wins."

 

Also, your comment "A championship requires a championship game or games where the tow best teams play" isn't true either. There are conferences in College Football that don't have a championship game, yet have a designated champion.
 

The NFL already officially recognizes both division & conference champions...here's even more proof (in case you didn't want to read any articles, watch any videos, or listen to any broadcasts that specifically reference division champions) - 
 

 

afc-east-titles-041217-min.jpeg

Indy_Banners_optimized.jpg

14 hours ago, billsredneck1 said:

Ok whatever you win I'm out of this thread. It's a waste of time coming back to it.

 

You were right...don't worry. I just posted proof in case he wants to keep arguing...

Edited by BigDingus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BigDingus said:

 

That's actually not true. They are called 9 time AFC East Champions. Just as the 90's Bills are always referred to as having won 5 out of 6 AFC East championships. 

Hell, just google any articles that discuss those teams, or the Bills franchise achievements as a whole. Here's just the Wikipedia page of the Bills - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_Bills

It even notes "Conference Championships," and "Division Championships" to go along with League Championships. In record books, in documentaries, in discussion, and on banners, division & conference championships are certainly referred to as "Championships," not "wins."

 

Also, your comment "A championship requires a championship game or games where the tow best teams play" isn't true either. There are conferences in College Football that don't have a championship game, yet have a designated champion.
 

The NFL already officially recognizes both division & conference champions...here's even more proof (in case you didn't want to read any articles, watch any videos, or listen to any broadcasts that specifically reference division champions) - 
 

 

afc-east-titles-041217-min.jpeg

Indy_Banners_optimized.jpg

 

You were right...don't worry. I just posted proof in case he wants to keep arguing...

Thank you Sir!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BigDingus said:

 

That's actually not true. They are called 9 time AFC East Champions. Just as the 90's Bills are always referred to as having won 5 out of 6 AFC East championships. 

Hell, just google any articles that discuss those teams, or the Bills franchise achievements as a whole. Here's just the Wikipedia page of the Bills - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_Bills

It even notes "Conference Championships," and "Division Championships" to go along with League Championships. In record books, in documentaries, in discussion, and on banners, division & conference championships are certainly referred to as "Championships," not "wins."

 

Also, your comment "A championship requires a championship game or games where the tow best teams play" isn't true either. There are conferences in College Football that don't have a championship game, yet have a designated champion.
 

The NFL already officially recognizes both division & conference champions...here's even more proof (in case you didn't want to read any articles, watch any videos, or listen to any broadcasts that specifically reference division champions) - 
 

 

afc-east-titles-041217-min.jpeg

Indy_Banners_optimized.jpg

 

You were right...don't worry. I just posted proof in case he wants to keep arguing...

 

 

The guy asked if I would pay off for a division "championship".  I said no.  Champs win a game for.....a championship. 

 

It's nice that teams hang banners describing themselves as champions.  Did the 2011 Tebow Broncos hang a banner?  How about the 2014 Panthers?  The 2013 Packers?  The 2010 Seahawks?  None of those "champions" had over 8 wins (3 had only 7) when  they won their "division championships".   So it's a meaningless designation and I wouldn't pay 10k for it.

 

The college comparison is a uniquely poor choice.  They didn't even have a playoff until fairly recently.  Eeven ranking teams had forever been notoriously debatable.  Conferences without a championship game have no real champ either.  They have "team with the conferences best record", then they go to some bottom tier bow gamel, if lucky.

Edited by Mr. WEO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...