Doc Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 hour ago, dave mcbride said: 1) It establishes a motive. 2) If she turned them off, it's not good for her. But we have no idea whether she did. We don't know enough at the moment. Look: trouble has a habit of following the guy, and he appears to be a blockhead. We'll see what happens, but it's way too soon to draft him for your fantasy team. The only thing linking Shady to this was the theft of the jewelry. Whether he was the outright owner or had it on loan doesn't matter really. But since he had it loaned to him, trying to steal it from his ex- and then returning it to the store would be incredibly stupid. 52 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: I think there is a growing concern that Shady may well end up on that indefinite suspension list, depending on how this plays out and how long we go without him being exonerated, assuming he is even going to be. This case may well not come to some type of resolution in any quick manner. This aspect of the story will become the most relevant part given enough time. Shady could easily be suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. There is no "growing concern" that he'll be suspended. If anything, with each passing day, the concern is dwindling. 38 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: He never should have been traded for in the first place. RBs aren't important in this league but he demands a high salary. Also, McCoy's talent doesn't really translate to wins for the Bills. The game is too big for that with too many moving pieces for a RB to impact the outcome. When you don't have a franchise QB, they're very important. With a franchise QB (and hopefully the Bills will have one), they're less important. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPP Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Sorry.....but im going to go off topic for a second.....At least this thread is WAY better than the daily boring Taylor threads that keep popping up on here........ok back on topic....thanks...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 The Buffalo News' Jay Skurski writes Chris Ivory "would be the first option" if LeSean McCoy is unavailable. Serious allegations against McCoy of domestic, child, and animal abuse surfaced this week, throwing his availability into question. Signed to a two-year deal in March, Ivory is the obvious replacement for McCoy if the Bills decide to stay in-house, but they could also look to add a veteran like DeMarco Murray or Adrian Peterson. No matter who takes over, Buffalo's offense will be in serious trouble if McCoy is out. Source: Buffalo News Jul 12 - 10:29 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bing Bong Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 WE'RE NOT GOING TO FIGURE ANYTHING OUT ABOUT THIS CASE FOR A WHILE, why are people complaining about getting poor insight on a TBD thread about a Shady allegation after.. 2 days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
co_springs_billsfan Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 hour ago, The Real Buffalo Joe said: But what if the water is coming from the faucet of a shared family home? African or European? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Joshin' Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 hour ago, Fadingpain said: I think there is a growing concern that Shady may well end up on that indefinite suspension list, depending on how this plays out and how long we go without him being exonerated, assuming he is even going to be. This case may well not come to some type of resolution in any quick manner. This aspect of the story will become the most relevant part given enough time. Shady could easily be suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Who's concern? Yours? I will wait for facts before I become concerned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Why was the sheet hanging out the window?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x-BillzeBubba Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Why was the sheet hanging out the window?? Son used it to sneak out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUSE Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 All I really care about is the Dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 hour ago, LikeIGiveADarn said: So at this point, we have no proof that McCoy beat his child, beat his dog, did PEDs, or had any previous domestic violence issues, and the only connection he has to this issue was a 911 call from a woman who was being sued by him. "a" woman living in his house wearing the jewelry he wanted back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LikeIGiveADarn Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 3 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: "a" woman living in his house wearing the jewelry he wanted back... which has now been returned to it's rightful owner who was not Shady. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 Just now, LikeIGiveADarn said: which has now been returned to it's rightful owner who was not Shady. Mario Williams? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 4 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: "a" woman living in his house wearing the jewelry he wanted back... ...and who was facing eviction with nowhere else to live, much less means to support herself... (next up) Just now, LikeIGiveADarn said: which has now been returned to it's rightful owner who was not Shady. From where are you getting this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 1 hour ago, BuffaloSol said: Someone saying "actually water isn't wet" is just them regurgitating a clickbait article they read to try and "get someone." And yes sorry I did get you and Murph6 a little confused. was that humor ? felt a bit like humor : ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LikeIGiveADarn Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Doc said: ...and who was facing eviction with nowhere else to live, much less means to support herself... (next up) From where are you getting this? Few pages back. Apparently the jewelry was loaned to her, and has since been recovered and returned to the jewelry store. Going to guess the thief pawned it, and the police took it from the pawn shop. Edited July 13, 2018 by LikeIGiveADarn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, Doc said: ...and who was facing eviction with nowhere else to live, much less means to support herself... (next up) From where are you getting this? That's true too. But she wasn't a stranger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 1 hour ago, JoPar_v2 said: She certainly does have tenant’s rights until those rights are revoked by a judge via an eviction proceeding. That hasn’t taken place yet. So not sure what you’re even saying anymore. That is like saying just because someone sues someone for $1 million that they have the right to $1 million until a jury says otherwise. The judge is going to find that she has NO right to stay there. You are arguing semantics just like DC Tom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, LikeIGiveADarn said: Few pages back. Apparently the jewelry was loaned to her, and has since been recovered and returned to the jewelry store. Going to guess the thief pawned it, and the police took it from the pawn shop. They haven't recovered the jewelry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LikeIGiveADarn Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 Just now, Doc said: They haven't recovered the jewelry. My mistake then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, LikeIGiveADarn said: Few pages back. Apparently the jewelry was loaned to her, and has since been recovered and returned to the jewelry store. Going to guess the thief pawned it, and the police took it from the pawn shop. You "guessed" this? lol The cops found which pawn shop the perp brought the evidence of crime to and the cops immediately took this evidence to a jewelry shop they somehow knew owned the evidence? Great guess... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts