BuffaloSol Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: Water molecules adhere to surfaces to produce the condition or feeling of being wet. The water itself is not wet as I posted the 1st time. Yes, as I posted the second time correcting my "saying" so you could understand it, when you touch water you get wet. "Water is wet" is a saying and is not meant to be taken literally, it means touching water gets you wet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, BuffaloSol said: Yes, as I posted the second time correcting my "saying" so you could understand it, when you touch water you get wet. "Water is wet" is a saying and is not meant to be taken literally, it means touching water gets you wet. Not what you said though. You said "Water is Wet." Why not talk about how the pope ***** in the woods if you wanted to make a more obvious statement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, BuffaloSol said: Yes, as I posted the second time correcting my "saying" so you could understand it, when you touch water you get wet. "Water is wet" is a saying and is not meant to be taken literally, it means touching water gets you wet. Your explanation is all wet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, BuffaloSol said: Yes, as I posted the second time correcting my "saying" so you could understand it, when you touch water you get wet. "Water is wet" is a saying and is not meant to be taken literally, it means touching water gets you wet. So "water is wet" is a metaphor for something being what it is, even though water isn't wet. That's actually a pretty bad metaphor. From now on, I'm using "Yeah, and water is an oxygen atom with two hydrogen - sometimes one hydrogen and one deuterium - atoms bound to it." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 8 minutes ago, dave mcbride said: I wouldn't say that at all. There's a fair bit of conflicting info out there, now, but some definitely points to McCoy. None of us know yet. 7 minutes ago, DC Tom said: The only thing I've seen pointing to McCoy is the woman's friend's instagram post and her lawyer's press release. This. 3 minutes ago, dave mcbride said: It appears that McCoy was an intermediary for the jewelry loan, which is pretty suggestive. I'm not saying that'll get him convicted or anything like that, but he's hardly out of the woods. Who turned off the cameras? We haven't found that out yet either. If she didn't, it's also suggestive. So what if he was the intermediary for the jewelry loan? And what if she turned off the cameras? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 20 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Why would I argue with myself? I'm right, and you're wrong. There is NOT a "ticking clock," there is a process, which is open ended, during which a tenant has a right of residency. There is NOTHING open ended about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, Peter said: There is NOTHING open ended about it. Except that the tenant can drag it on and on and on... 1 minute ago, Doc said: So what if he was the intermediary for the jewelry loan? And what if she turned off the cameras? More to the point, "What if?" doesn't point to anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 So anyway, the big takeaway seems to be that that we're watching an idiots edition the game Clue being played in which the players are analogues of Jeff Gillooly, Shawn Eckhardt, LaVona Golden, and Tonja Harding. I'm not sure there's a Nancy Kerrigan analogue (yet), however ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Except that the tenant can drag it on and on and on... More to the point, "What if?" doesn't point to anything. Yup. And we can "what if" all day long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, The Real Buffalo Joe said: Not what you said though. You said "Water is Wet." Why not talk about how the pope ***** in the woods if you wanted to make a more obvious statement? Or a bear being catholic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoPar_v2 Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Peter said: There is NOTHING open ended about it. Which is something someone who doesn’t understand the full process of eviction would say. Go back to Westlaw and look into it a little more petey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, dave mcbride said: So anyway, the big takeaway seems to be that that we're watching an idiots edition the game Clue being played in which the players are analogues of Jeff Gillooly, Shawn Eckhardt, LaVona Golden, and Tonja Harding. I'm not sure there's a Nancy Kerrigan analogue (yet), however ... I think of it as more of a remake of The Usual Suspects, starring Seth Rogen as Keyser Soze. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, Wayne Cubed said: Or a bear being catholic? I can barely keep up with these metaphors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Doc said: Yup. And we can "what if" all day long. What if we "what if'd" all day long? Would water be wet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, Wayne Cubed said: Or a bear being catholic? Plenty of bears are coming around to different forms of Protestantism. But let't not fill the thread with boring conversation. Back to Georgia Pennant Law! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, Doc said: This. So what if he was the intermediary for the jewelry loan? And what if she turned off the cameras? 1) It establishes a motive. 2) If she turned them off, it's not good for her. But we have no idea whether she did. We don't know enough at the moment. Look: trouble has a habit of following the guy, and he appears to be a blockhead. We'll see what happens, but it's way too soon to draft him for your fantasy team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: I can barely keep up with these metaphors. It now occurs to me that "water is wet" is a pretty good metaphor for "water is wet," given that water isn't really wet and "water is wet" isn't really a metaphor. Now I'm confused... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloSol Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: So "water is wet" is a metaphor for something being what it is, even though water isn't wet. That's actually a pretty bad metaphor. From now on, I'm using "Yeah, and water is an oxygen atom with two hydrogen - sometimes one hydrogen and one deuterium - atoms bound to it." 6 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Your explanation is all wet. 6 minutes ago, The Real Buffalo Joe said: Not what you said though. You said "Water is Wet." Why not talk about how the pope ***** in the woods if you wanted to make a more obvious statement? I thought I was talking to normal people that have heard these sayings before not a buzzfeed clickbait article regurgitated that says "Stump all your friends, 10 sayings that are actually false." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x-BillzeBubba Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 How would she know the camera was "off"...this system supposedly was recently installed and that she had no access to it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxxxxxxx Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 (edited) 10 hours ago, dubs said: The stat you cite is in this book? Or a book about the topic. Two very different things. What stat do you want, I only quoted one stat. You seem to be asserting that I quoted 2. The first one is well known and accurate regarding false crime reports. When someone says 50 50 its a figure of speech, never said it was a stat. If it was a stat I would of said it was. You do know the difference between a stat and a figure of speech, right. Or does that need to be explained to you too. Just like the fact that people who insist that women inflict abuse on themselves without evidence are !@#$s. Edited July 12, 2018 by MURPHD6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts