Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, BeastMode54 said:

Adrian Peterson anyone?

Why not see if Pierre Thomas, Thomas Jones and CJ Spiller are available? <sarcasm>

Edited by Cornette's Commentary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

Dh6BwTIUwAE405v.png

How should he celebrate?

He should have a female only birthday party!

2 minutes ago, BeastMode54 said:

Adrian Peterson anyone?

Lose one alleged abuser, you add one.  Simple math. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BeastMode54 said:

Adrian Peterson anyone?

have you seen him play the last couple of seasons?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dablitzkrieg said:

I am very dissapointed in all of you this morning.  I can't believe this thread has only made it to page 121.  This is unacceptable.  I expect more from this group.  Think about this moving forward.  I expect us to be at 150 pages by midnight!:w00t:

 

I'm disappointed too - but for a very different reason.  

 

I enjoyed this thread when it was offering new information, intelligent speculation, and spirited debate.   

 

It's seems to have gone off the rails a bit lately.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm the Bills. I get him placed on the Commissioner exempt list today. Don't wait. Your brand is much more important than one aging superstar. He stays there until it plays out. He gets charged, immediately cut. He doesn't, and the cops find no wrongdoing, he comes off the exempt list and back on the active roster. With allegations like these, he should even see the training camp field. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:

 

I'm disappointed too - but for a very different reason.  

 

I enjoyed this thread when it was offering new information, intelligent speculation, and spirited debate.   

 

It's seems to have gone off the rails a bit lately.  

To add to the strangeness of this story, there’s no news, at all, since the initial posts and police report.  The story has even fallen off the main page of ESPN.    

 

When theres no news, nothing to speculate on, I guess all we have left is to go off the rails ha. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dablitzkrieg said:

I am very dissapointed in all of you this morning.  I can't believe this thread has only made it to page 121.  This is unacceptable.  I expect more from this group.  Think about this moving forward.  I expect us to be at 150 pages by midnight!:w00t:

 

i think it caused a few to snap and get banned, who would have added 80 pages each on this topic.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Fadingpain said:

If he was after jewelry in her possession, why would he chose a break in time, post-eviction?

 

She and her possessions, including jewelry, would be gone. 

 

In that scenario, you'd want to hit the house before she was evicted, right?

 

I was thinking that since the jewelry was owned by McCoy, she would have to leave it at the house when she left the property.  But as others pointed out, who knows what this girl would do with the jewelry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Watkins90 said:

If I'm the Bills. I get him placed on the Commissioner exempt list today. Don't wait. Your brand is much more important than one aging superstar. He stays there until it plays out. He gets charged, immediately cut. He doesn't, and the cops find no wrongdoing, he comes off the exempt list and back on the active roster. With allegations like these, he should even see the training camp field. 

 

I would think the Commissioner is the one that gets to put people on the Commissioner's Exempt list.  And they're not even at training camp yet, so he's not seeing that field.

 

Regardless of WHAT the Bills do right now, Shady is tied to their brand (I just had to answer questions in the work kitchen 😂), so might as well let it play out a little bit longer...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, joesixpack said:

 

 

Please.

 

Just !@#$ing please.

 

The woman was a freeloader, and recalcitrant. Just because she got beat up doesn't mean we should canonize her. THAT AIN'T MISOGYNY.  It's the truth.

I said SPRINKLED with...Don't take my word out of context.

Edited by PetermanThrew5Picks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Watkins90 said:

If I'm the Bills. I get him placed on the Commissioner exempt list today. Don't wait. Your brand is much more important than one aging superstar. He stays there until it plays out. He gets charged, immediately cut. He doesn't, and the cops find no wrongdoing, he comes off the exempt list and back on the active roster. With allegations like these, he should even see the training camp field. 

 

Jeepers-creepers, Watkins, other than claims made in a statement from his ex-girlfriend/house squatter's attorney there is no evidence against him and no reason to just flat out believe (without supplemental information) the word of someone who has a direct and contrary interest to Shady's.

 

Come on, man, that's not right and that's not fair.  He's your player if your the Bills and you run on him at the very whiff of something?  Your other players would love that and thank management, I'm sure.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, dollars 2 donuts said:

 

Jeepers-creepers, Watkins, other than claims made in a statement from his ex-girlfriend/house squatter's attorney there is no evidence against him and no reason to just flat out believe (without supplemental information) the word of someone who has a direct and contrary interest to Shady's.

 

Come on, man, that's not right and that's not fair.  He's your player if your the Bills and you run on him at the very whiff of something?  Your other players would love that and thank management, I'm sure.

 

 

 

it's about the Image of the Shield, this is not good for the Image of the Shield

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

it's about the Image of the Shield, this is not good for the Image of the Shield

 

 

 

row, what isn't good for the image of the Shield?!

 

What DID HE DO THAT YOU KNOW AS FACT?!!!!!!

 

My biggest problem so far has been the use of language and allegations as fact in this.

 

I'm the guy who twittered Howard Simon yesterday and said you shouldn't use the word "facts" and instead use the word "allegations" which he did.

Edited by dollars 2 donuts
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

it's about the Image of the Shield, this is not good for the Image of the Shield

 

 

The damage has been done to "the Shield" already.  Cutting or putting him on the Exempt list (if they can) based only on allegations would make the Bills look worse...

Edited by ricojes
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If people are advocating that players go on the exempt list due to, so far, unsubstantiated allegations... can we have someone on the board make unsubstantiated allegations against Tom Brady?

  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, SCBills said:

If people are advocating that players go on the exempt list due to, so far, unsubstantiated allegations... can we have someone on the board make unsubstantiated allegations against Tom Brady?

That would be easy, he's been bending us over for years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, dollars 2 donuts said:

I'm the guy who twittered Howard Simon yesterday and said you shouldn't use the word "facts" and instead use the word "allegations" which he did.

Whoa Whoa-this is a family board here....

 

image.thumb.png.13d0df2868069a8d83320065d0e19164.png

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There has to be a way to skim through this easier for new updates and stuff rather than jamming all 122 pages into one thread. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, ricojes said:

The damage has been done to "the Shield" already.  Cutting or putting him on the Exempt list (if they can) based only on allegations would make the Bills look worse...

 

tough situation....

17 minutes ago, SDubills said:

There has to be a way to skim through this easier for new updates and stuff rather than jamming all 122 pages into one thread. 

 

who wants to read all 122 pages, mostly comprised of conversation consisting of:

 

eff you

no eff you

no eff you!!

NO!! EFF YOU!!!!

NOOOOO!!! EFF YOU!!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, SCBills said:

If people are advocating that players go on the exempt list due to, so far, unsubstantiated allegations... can we have someone on the board make unsubstantiated allegations against Tom Brady?

 

Can you show me on this doll where Tom Brady touched you?

 

Image result for doll

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Boatdrinks said:

Nope, not sad at all. If it didn’t involve McCoy not many of us would be interested or even know about it. I do know she is refusing to leave a house that she doesn’t own. I can only imagine what else she finds to be acceptable behavior in her life. Her claimed “ victim” status doesn’t move my sympathy meter much. Guess I’m a terrible person. 

.. I guess, you're obviously reading her story more than I am, I don't care to read it cause it's nothing to do with the Bills. Call me crazy, but outside of serious criminal behavior nobody deserves to be beaten to a pulp lol. We don't need to act like this was an act of vigilante justice for pete's sake.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

tough situation....

 

who wants to read all 122 pages, mostly comprised of conversation consisting of:

 

eff you

no eff you

no eff you!!

NO!! EFF YOU!!!!

NOOOOO!!! EFF YOU!!!

Hey, eff you, pal 😂😂😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, dollars 2 donuts said:

 

row, what isn't good for the image of the Shield?!

 

What DID HE DO THAT YOU KNOW AS FACT?!!!!!!

 

 My biggest problem so far has been the use of language and allegations as fact in this.

 

 I'm the guy who twittered Howard Simon yesterday and said you shouldn't use the word "facts" and instead use the word "allegations" which he did.

That's technically Libel, and horrible reporting. Good hustle.

 

Pretty sure row was being facetious. I hope (whoever uses words "the shield" seriously is a tool). But he's right.. facts aren't required, since Ray Rice, you don't need facts, just simple publicity on domestic violence ruins the INTEGRITY OF THE SHIELD.

 

Zeke is a classic example, and I could see Shady getting 6 games the year after next, unless he's proven to have absolutely no involvement. A tall order to prove total innocence, rather than a proving not guilty.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×