Koko78 Posted July 7, 2018 Share Posted July 7, 2018 1 hour ago, /dev/null said: What worries me is talk from the Left about packing the Court next time a Democrat holds the White House. Of course that sets a dangerous precedent, but that never stopped the Left before. That's going to go about as well as the time Roosevelt tried to pack the court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted July 7, 2018 Share Posted July 7, 2018 As long as the GOP doesn’t continue to pack it with liberals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Goat Posted July 7, 2018 Share Posted July 7, 2018 Business Insider: "A top Republican senator offered a potentially massive clue about the identity of Trump's Supreme Court pick." http://www.businessinsider.com/sen-orrin-hatch-gave-huge-clue-on-trumps-supreme-court-pick-2018-7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 7, 2018 Share Posted July 7, 2018 11 hours ago, Golden Goat said: Business Insider: "A top Republican senator offered a potentially massive clue about the identity of Trump's Supreme Court pick." http://www.businessinsider.com/sen-orrin-hatch-gave-huge-clue-on-trumps-supreme-court-pick-2018-7 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 Bloomberg reporter floats idea that Amy Coney Barrett would reverse Brown v. Board of Education, but… I'm sure that you won't be surprised to read that the misleading tweet got the left in an uproar, and................ surprise it gives a completely false slant about Judge Barrett. This is what happens when political reporters try to play gotcha with law articles... The original misleading tweet now has almost 800 RT’s and countless QT’s from large accounts attacking ACB. ~Zero of those people read any of the actual paper or will ever retract. . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Bloomberg reporter floats idea that Amy Coney Barrett would reverse Brown v. Board of Education, but… I'm sure that you won't be surprised to read that the misleading tweet got the left in an uproar, and................ surprise it gives a completely false slant about Judge Barrett. . It established the narrative, though. So now it's fact. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 Can't wait for Senators to ask the nominee if the President is above the law, should he have to testify in a criminal matter, can he ignore a subpoena, can he self pardon himself. Fun times! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Can't wait for Senators to ask the nominee if the President is above the law, should he have to testify in a criminal matter, can he ignore a subpoena, can he self pardon himself. Fun times! Everyone on the left have been ignoring subpoenas. It's only bad when the other side does it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 Ignore the "squirrel" questions. THE SUPREME COURT SWEEPSTAKES: Jonathan Adler discusses the top candidates … or at least the candidates that somebody said were at the top. Paul Mirengoff discusses the same four. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 One more from Miller since he's on a roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 IS ANYONE SURPRISED? VIDEO: Students hate Trump’s SCOTUS pick… before he made it. This month, Justice Anthony Kennedy announced he would be retiring from the Supreme Court of the United States, giving President Trump an opportunity to nominate a potential replacement. Instantly, Trump’s political opponents began questioning the credentials of those who were thought to be on his shortlist for the position. The same sentiment was seen on social media from pundits and members of Congress alike -- but what would college students have to say about the matter? Did they have substantive reasons for not trusting the potential replacement, or were they simply set on opposing any Trump nominee? To find out, I headed to New York University to ask students what they thought about who Trump had chosen to replace Justice Kennedy. Despite the fact that Trump’s decision was still days away from being finalized, students unanimously condemned Trump’s move, harshly criticizing the president’s nonexistent nominee. “He’s quite extreme in his views,” said one student of the fictitious Judge. “I saw it all over the news, that he’s like racist,” another student added, referring to the announcement that hadn’t yet happened. “I saw the new nominee is like racist, and he’s starting a new wave of something very negative, and I’m really scared about the future and what choices he will make,” another pupil added. When asked if she’d seen the online coverage of the event, one faculty member described witnessing “outrage… as it should be.” What else did students have to say? Did anyone realize the decision had not yet been made? Watch the full video to find out: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 16 minutes ago, B-Man said: IS ANYONE SURPRISED? Not even a little. It's like an entire university of Tibs/gators/baskins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 Go back to your dorm rooms and crack the books kids, you don’t have a prayer in life otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 3 hours ago, B-Man said: IS ANYONE SURPRISED? VIDEO: Students hate Trump’s SCOTUS pick… before he made it. This month, Justice Anthony Kennedy announced he would be retiring from the Supreme Court of the United States, giving President Trump an opportunity to nominate a potential replacement. Instantly, Trump’s political opponents began questioning the credentials of those who were thought to be on his shortlist for the position. The same sentiment was seen on social media from pundits and members of Congress alike -- but what would college students have to say about the matter? Did they have substantive reasons for not trusting the potential replacement, or were they simply set on opposing any Trump nominee? To find out, I headed to New York University to ask students what they thought about who Trump had chosen to replace Justice Kennedy. Despite the fact that Trump’s decision was still days away from being finalized, students unanimously condemned Trump’s move, harshly criticizing the president’s nonexistent nominee. “He’s quite extreme in his views,” said one student of the fictitious Judge. “I saw it all over the news, that he’s like racist,” another student added, referring to the announcement that hadn’t yet happened. “I saw the new nominee is like racist, and he’s starting a new wave of something very negative, and I’m really scared about the future and what choices he will make,” another pupil added. When asked if she’d seen the online coverage of the event, one faculty member described witnessing “outrage… as it should be.” What else did students have to say? Did anyone realize the decision had not yet been made? Watch the full video to find out: I watched the full video, and it's pretty clear that most of those statements are made about Trump, not a non-existent Supreme Court nominee, and it was cut to make the students look dumber than they really are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: I watched the full video, and it's pretty clear that most of those statements are made about Trump, not a non-existent Supreme Court nominee, and it was cut to make the students look dumber than they really are. Most public media interviews talk to 60 people and pick the two dumbest to reflect the biased narrative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 4 minutes ago, row_33 said: Most public media interviews talk to 60 people and pick the two dumbest to reflect the biased narrative Yes, I'm well aware. But this particular Campus Reform video goes well beyond that practice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 Should see what Canadian TV does to Americans with this media trick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 8, 2018 Share Posted July 8, 2018 . 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 (edited) Handmaids' Resistance gather at the Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. District Courthouse for a press conference about the SCOTUS vacancy and womens' rights. What’s sad is that the only people there to see it where the media cameras. . Stunts and Gimmicks that's todays democrats. . Edited July 9, 2018 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 2 hours ago, B-Man said: Handmaids' Resistance gather at the Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. District Courthouse for a press conference about the SCOTUS vacancy and womens' rights. What’s sad is that the only people there to see it where the media cameras. . Stunts and Gimmicks that's todays democrats. . Same morons were probably there protesting O'Connor 35 years ago. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts