Jump to content

Requiem for a sports columnist


Recommended Posts

Sully's biggest problem was that we sucked for so long and he had the nerve to say it. I didn't always agree, but I had no problem with him calling all those people out when they were failing. In fact, he was right all along about Whaley when so many (myself included) were still supporting him. He just had that annoying habit of being right that made Bills fans upset. He was the only columnist worth reading over there. No matter. Sports columns are pretty dull as a rule anyways so I won't miss much.

Edited by GreggTX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

 

Didn't I read here that Sully and others were offered buyouts?  That's much different than being shown the door.  He's 73 years old, getting a buyout at that point, I'm sure he's laughing all the way to he bank.

 

He's a columnist, not a true beat reporter, so he really doesn't need sources, he is paid to write what he wants.

 

 

 

Someone who can write what he wants and have it published, I think that's called a job!.  His editors apparently didn't delete the stuff because they thought it was good. 

 

Sorry you don't understand that!

I didn't know he was 73, damn!

 

As for Tyler Dunne and his "great sources", Dimwit Doug Whaley had his ear and he regurgitated quite a bit of Lil Doug's BS. Not quite at a Chris Brown-level, but he ended up defending the indefensible a lot of the time... of course, the naive and the less-savvy fans ate it up. A total hack.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, WIDE LEFT said:

Jerry Sullivan was shown the door and in typical fashion he portrayed his departure as being motivated by his “independence” as a critic of the Bills. We expect a columnist to be critical, nobody ever had a problem with that. But Sullivan’s entire claim to fame, in his mind, was that he was an independent critic and not a fan. But he took that to a level wherein he was critical of everything, without any balance. So he was equally as critical of the Bills during their Super Bowl years as well the drought years. The Pegulas were “over their heads” as owners, as if every new owner comes into the league with experience & expertise. Virtually every new owner is owning a franchise for the first time. And they took over the franchise from an owner who, despite is 50+ years of experience, ran the franchise into the ground. He also had a heads I win, tails you lose mentality. When Dareus had his troubles early in his career, Sullivan wanted the Bills to cut him. After Dareus had his big pro bowl year, Sullivan completely flipped to Dareus side. When Dareus had his most recent problems/issues, Sullivan wrote “see I told you so, should have cut him like I said” Heads he is right, tails he is right

 

But none of the above was Sullivan’s biggest weakness. The biggest problem with Sullivan was that in all his years there, he never developed any sources of information, either inside the Bills organization or within the NFL, to provide insight or analysis based on experience, film study etc etc. So all you ever got from him was just the opinion of a guy who never played or coached the game, who never watched game film and who never developed a source or asset who had the experience/expertise to provide insight. Sullivan’s opinions were no more valid than any fan sitting on a bar stool watching the game on TV. And that was obvious from his columns. Tyler Dunne was with the News for one year, and consistently produced columns that were based on his interactions with NFL insiders or those with experience & expertise in evaluating the game. It was no wonder that Dunne was hired away after one year here, while Sullivan took the easy path of voicing uninformed opinions mixed in with potshots at everybody. And felt that was good enough, because after all, he was “no fan”.  Criticism is fine and welcome; but readers/subscribers are entitled to informed opinions, or at least occasional insight from sources well placed, well versed or experienced with game of professional football. Sullivan could not be bothered to provide any of that. Good riddance 

 

Where is he now?

 

 

12 hours ago, billsredneck1 said:

i'm not a subscriber to bn ( from rochester) but none of them ever really bothered me (listening to them on wgr), whether i agreed with them or not. i absorb anything bills and quite frankly a lot of posts on this site are much more irritating.

 

heck, chris brown used to get under my skin with his russ and doug comapny line bootlicking, but now i love listening to him. sometimes it's hard for me to tell the difference between him and tasker on the radio. one bills live is my favorite 3 hrs. of the weekday......so it really irks me when the instigators take over the day. sorry, but i hate hockey........ or have less than zero interest in it.

 

I like the Sabres but the instigators are the worst, I turn the channel if those chuckle heads are on.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Agreed and Sullivan isn't alone...........there isn't anyone at TBN or in the Bills organization that would be missed by the average fan.   

 

I disagree.  I think I would miss Chris Brown.  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never had an issue with him either.  I get why some people didnt like him...but like others have said if you dont like it you dont read it.  I think there is alot of overreaction when it comes to Sullivan.   Now if tbn decided they wanted to go in another direction i understand that.  But its not like hes a bad guy people need to relax a little bit about Sullivan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never read Sully as I didn’t like his. Opinions.  I never cared for him, but if you liked him fine.  The BN just made a business decision.  Newspapers have been going down for years.   The only people I know who actually get the paper in any city are retirees.  It is their generation.

 

i read these news stories, but always on-line, and refuse to pay the Buffalo News $3 a month when every other paper you can read for free.  They have advertising dollars to fund their company.  I used to work for the News in college, as my Dad worked there for 44 years.  They’ve always been cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Fadingpain said:

Jerry Sullivan is a heck of a good writer.  

 

The type of forum member here who views this place as "The Buffalo Bills Booster Club" never understood Jerry, and never will.

 

I think some of the criticism thrown at him is warranted, however.  There were some columns that did seem to be really dark for the sake of being really dark.

 

But that was kind of his thing.

 

 

 

 

It is your opinion that he is a good writer and you're entitled to it.  I will say that he didn't write choppy crap like you see a lot nowadays.  The structure of his writing was mostly fine.

 

From my point of view he wrote the same article 1000 times and changed the nouns.  Boring.  Take a different angle once in a while dude.

 

Does anyone remember a band called Boston?  If you've never heard them before and you do for the first time, you'll think they are good songwriters and talented musicians.  When you listen more you'll hear the same song every time.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Green Lightning said:

The OP has it about right, but so do those who say if he plays he stays. I stopped reading him many years ago because he was a cynic, not a skeptic. That and he basically wrote the same column over and over again. I found him boring and lazy. So I didn't read him. Problem solved. Likely a lot of others stopped reading him as well  because if his numbers were up he'd still be there.

P*ssing in Cheerios daily doesn't constitute an opposing view. I used to refer to him as the "little cloud that cried."  I don't think he ever had a nice day in his life and wanted everyone else to feel like crap along with him.

Couldn't agree more.  Haven't read his columns since they were free and linked to TBD, but when I did, his columns seemed one-note and predictable.  Some posters say they were angered by Sullivan.  Personally, I find it hard to get angry at someone who just predictably says, "this sucks" at every move.   Bored, yes.  Angry, no.  And yes, columnists who get readers angry DO sell papers....but columnists who bore their readers do not.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Kwai San said:

Wow - 2 takeaways - Sully is gone and the dude was 73.......ya his time was up.  Certainly his replacement will get ridden into the ground as well.

 

 

1

 

8 hours ago, Rico said:

I didn't know he was 73, damn!

 

 

 

He's not..just like a newspaper these days, one must always fact check. 

 

63

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little personal Sully story.

 

In 2002 Jerry wrote a glowing column about Tom Donahoe drafting OT Mike Williams. Several years later, once it was obvious Williams was a Grade A bust, Sully wrote a column ripping Donahoe for drafting Williams. I emailed Jerry and reminded him that he loved the pick in 2002, and wasn't it a bit disingenuous to be wailing on the GM now? Jerry wrote back to explain that as a columnist he had the prerogative to change his opinion. (True, but in that column he could have admitted that he also liked Williams at the time. He didn't.)

 

Anyway, thinking back, I wonder if Jerry leaned to the negative with the Bills so he never would need to reverse himself like this again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PromoTheRobot said:

Anyway, thinking back, I wonder if Jerry leaned to the negative with the Bills so he never would need to reverse himself like this again?

 

 

Because he knew they would be incapable of righting themselves in a league designed to promote parity?

 

Not even the most cynical could have predicteded the team not making the playoffs for 17 years or not  having a 10 win season for nearly 2 decades and counting.  

 

Ralph was a terrible football man as we all know but "the drought" nearly tripled any previous length of playoff absence.   

 

And when they did reach the playoffs after those prior extended periods on the outside......... they actually had teams that had to be accounted for as contenders.

 

The struggle was.......and still is.......real for this organization.

Edited by BADOLBILZ
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

Ralph was a terrible football man as we all know but "the drought" nearly tripled any previous length of playoff absence.   

 

How could it triple the length of any previous playoff drought when the Browns were always right there two years behind? Then you have Tampa...Jets, bears who were all less then triple. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/24/2018 at 9:58 AM, WIDE LEFT said:

My point exactly - no worse or better than opinions voiced here. Except from a professional/paid sportswriter/columnist, you should expect more than what’s posted on Two Bills Dr

Maybe a tad bit over sensitive with very Fragile feelings? Why do you believe you should expect more, it's a fricking game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vorpma said:

Why do you believe you should expect more, it's a fricking game?

 

Access.   Resources.   Experience.   Talent.   

 

Four good reasons to expect more.   Should I go on?...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Lurker said:

 

Access.   Resources.   Experience.   Talent.   

 

Four good reasons to expect more.   Should I go on?...

Man, you need to get out more; I guess I am somewhat stunned that someones life is so emotionally tied to a sportswriter who expresses OPINIONS!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, vorpma said:

Man, you need to get out more; I guess I am somewhat stunned that someones life is so emotionally tied to a sportswriter who expresses OPINIONS!

No one is emotionally tied like you claim.  You did the same nonsense with me last night.  People are having a discussion, and you are the one being emotional, typing in caps and such because some don't agree with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

No one is emotionally tied like you claim.  You did the same nonsense with me last night.  People are having a discussion, and you are the one being emotional, typing in caps and such because some don't agree with you.

But I am a societal problem! But I remained stunned!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Want t there a thread on this **** already? Sully sure had a lot of readers for so many people hating him. I never had a problem with him. Not saying I always agreed with him. He is a sports columnist, which is to say his opinion is irrelevant so it never bothered me. To many candy assess that can't handle the criticism about their team.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...