LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, westside said: I don't know about anyone else, but I'm convinced! Hard to refute the truth of the data.... unless you fudge the raw data and cook up a taxpayer funded "study" that concludes the exact opposite of what the raw data did... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 The "warmer" explanation is that the Co2 clumped over NA and fled Greenland.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Because the artic ocean is small and shallow Gonna start calling you the Arctic Ocean from now on. 1 hour ago, LaDexter said: What is truly funny is that EVERYTHING I have posted here is true, and that is why you treasonous Zionist bigots only resort to name calling and calls for censorship... Yes, I call you an idiot because I was instructed to by the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 I chose the right day to check in on PPP. The new dance moves I've learned will take me far in life. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 31 minutes ago, LaDexter said: The "warmer" explanation is that the Co2 clumped over NA and fled Greenland.... https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=georgie+boy+song&view=detail&mid=310680B7515B8BDD835E310680B7515B8BDD835E&FORM=VIRE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Gonna start calling you the Arctic Ocean from now on. Be efficient, call me "Arc" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 WTF is going on in here, this place is all kinds of crazy, I think I like it 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Bray Wyatt said: WTF is going on in here, this place is all kinds of crazy, I think I like it 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 CO2 does warm the atmosphere Even the Methodists say so! Ways we can combat climate change – The United Methodist Church www.umc.org/what-we-believe/ways-we-can-combat-climate-change Sep 19, 2017 - These phenomena include global warming and “extreme weather events” (NASA ... The cars we drive are also big producers of carbon dioxide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 How could anyone be against plant food? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: How could anyone be against plant food? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 (edited) 44 minutes ago, Tiberius said: CO2 does warm the atmosphere That's not what the RAW DATA said.... We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps - satellites and balloons - and both showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2.... http://www.nbcnews.com/id/8917093/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/key-claim-against-global-warming-evaporates/#.Wyv07VU3nGI "satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling." More precisely, both were flat lines that went up and down a bit. In 1998, for example, when Slick Willie said it was the "warmest year ever," both the balloons and satellites showed a cooler than normal atmosphere.... So the fudgebakers bilking the taxpayer had a "problem" with that data, despite the fact that both series were highly correlated. In science, if you have two different measures of the same thing, and both measures are highly correlated, you accept the data, for you have no reason to challenge it. But with more than $10 billion per year of taxpayer money at stake, the "warmers" didn't want to admit the truth of the data, so they fudged both series with uncorrelated "corrections..." "Scientists (cough cough( were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data." With $10 billion per year at stake, guess which one they CHOSE.... Edited June 21, 2018 by LaDexter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 20 minutes ago, LaDexter said: That's not what the RAW DATA said.... We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps - satellites and balloons - and both showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2.... http://www.nbcnews.com/id/8917093/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/key-claim-against-global-warming-evaporates/#.Wyv07VU3nGI "satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling." More precisely, both were flat lines that went up and down a bit. In 1998, for example, when Slick Willie said it was the "warmest year ever," both the balloons and satellites showed a cooler than normal atmosphere.... So the fudgebakers bilking the taxpayer had a "problem" with that data, despite the fact that both series were highly correlated. In science, if you have two different measures of the same thing, and both measures are highly correlated, you accept the data, for you have no reason to challenge it. But with more than $10 billion per year of taxpayer money at stake, the "warmers" didn't want to admit the truth of the data, so they fudged both series with uncorrelated "corrections..." "Scientists (cough cough( were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data." With $10 billion per year at stake, guess which one they CHOSE.... Soooooo what are you trying to say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 On 6/20/2018 at 3:06 PM, LaDexter said: There are two theories as to the "origin" of Osama Bin Laden. The first is the "official" 911 line, that Bin Laden was a SAUDI CLERIC who moved to Afghan in 1994 and started terror group "al Qaeda." The official line is that Bin Laden never wore any military uniform. The second is the 911 Truther line, that Osama is really someone named Col Tom or Tim Os(s)man, a "CIA Asset." These photos clearly prove the latter.... https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/osama-bin-laden-tim-osman-cia-ajiesh-tk http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/binladen_cia.html http://www.jar2.com/2/Iraq/Osama_Bin_Laden.html https://hoaxeye.com/2017/05/28/zbigniew-brzezinski-with-osama-bin-laden/ The other man is simply a member of Pakistani Army. More details about this and similar photos on 911Myths. How about the Tim Osman/Bin Laden conspiracy theory? Again: there is no evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 5 minutes ago, bdutton said: The other man is simply a member of Pakistani Army. That's the Zionist spin, that the "member of Pakistani Army" is 100% fluent in English, a long time friend and associate of Ziggy, and gets one on ones with the US NSA without any other security present. The two even shoot rifles together. Just how STUPID do you have to be to buy that one....???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 6 minutes ago, bdutton said: https://hoaxeye.com/2017/05/28/zbigniew-brzezinski-with-osama-bin-laden/ The other man is simply a member of Pakistani Army. More details about this and similar photos on 911Myths. How about the Tim Osman/Bin Laden conspiracy theory? Again: there is no evidence. Why are you bothering? Dancing Hassidim are much more effective. Can't forget our Ethiopian cousins 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 6 minutes ago, LaDexter said: That's the Zionist spin, that the "member of Pakistani Army" is 100% fluent in English, a long time friend and associate of Ziggy, and gets one on ones with the US NSA without any other security present. The two even shoot rifles together. Just how STUPID do you have to be to buy that one....???? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 41 minutes ago, LaDexter said: That's not what the RAW DATA said.... We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps - satellites and balloons - and both showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2.... And 400 years of ground-based thermometer readings, and oxygen isotope ratios... 11 minutes ago, LaDexter said: That's the Zionist spin, that the "member of Pakistani Army" is 100% fluent in English Because nobody in the previously British colony of India ever learned fluent English. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: And 400 years of ground-based thermometer readings, and oxygen isotope ratios... Is that the technical term for cow farts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts