KD in CA Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: Speaking as a guy who lives in California you’d never know anyone other than Bloomberg and Bernie are on the ballot. I’ve yet to see a single TV ad for Biden, Amy, Mayor Pete or Pocahontas. It was the same 4 years ago when I first moved here. You would have never known (in the Bay Area anyway) that there was a nominee named Clinton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 I live in LA, surrounded by these #######s, literally living with 2 of these dips hits. They are insufferable. I want it to sink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 15 minutes ago, KD in CA said: It was the same 4 years ago when I first moved here. You would have never known (in the Bay Area anyway) that there was a nominee named Clinton. 14 minutes ago, 32ABBA said: I live in LA, surrounded by these #######s, literally living with 2 of these dips hits. They are insufferable. I want it to sink. Ahhhhh beautiful Orange County. Nobody pooping in my flower pots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 4 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Ahhhhh beautiful Orange County. Nobody pooping in my flower pots. I lived in Anaheim, too....it was worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 Just now, 32ABBA said: I lived in Anaheim, too....it was worse. Oh sorry. Let me clarify. South Orange County. I don't get out much. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 Typical Leftists YOU’RE GONNA NEED A BIGGER BLOG: New freelance law AB5 illustrates what’s wrong with the Democratic super-majority in Sacramento. . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 5 hours ago, B-Man said: Typical Leftists YOU’RE GONNA NEED A BIGGER BLOG: New freelance law AB5 illustrates what’s wrong with the Democratic super-majority in Sacramento. . I can't wait for them to secede! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 6 hours ago, B-Man said: Typical Leftists YOU’RE GONNA NEED A BIGGER BLOG: New freelance law AB5 illustrates what’s wrong with the Democratic super-majority in Sacramento. . Maybe they should look at it like flood insurance, but then again maybe they should examine the recent practices that have made such large areas susceptible to wildfires. So-called environmentalists have led the way to more frequent and substantial fires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 6 hours ago, B-Man said: Typical Leftists YOU’RE GONNA NEED A BIGGER BLOG: New freelance law AB5 illustrates what’s wrong with the Democratic super-majority in Sacramento. . I don’t see the issue with this. They insure against a risk. That’s what they do. Yes we will insure you because we’re required to. Your premiums will $12,000 a month. They price risk. It’s what they do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 2 hours ago, Chef Jim said: I don’t see the issue with this. They insure against a risk. That’s what they do. Yes we will insure you because we’re required to. Your premiums will $12,000 a month. They price risk. It’s what they do. Oh don't worry, the followup bill will make it a guaranteed human right to have fire insurance for $12 a month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 RARE SIGNS OF SANITY IN CALIFORNIA: That Freelance Job-Killing Law Is So Bad That the California Legislature May Dump It Next Week. But note this: Next week, Republican Assemblyman Kevin Kiley is hoping that enough California lawmakers have received enough blowback to put a stop to the madness…They should just blow up AB 5 and pretend it never happened, but Kiley’s a Republican and California Democrats have a supermajority. They can do anything they want – including destroying the jobs of millions of Californians. They couldn’t have destroyed more jobs if they’d planned it. Maybe next week the Assembly rolls it back. Stay tuned. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Joshin' Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 On 2/18/2020 at 2:28 PM, SoCal Deek said: Speaking as a guy who lives in California you’d never know anyone other than Bloomberg and Bernie are on the ballot. I’ve yet to see a single TV ad for Biden, Amy, Mayor Pete or Pocahontas. Same here in Austin Texas area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 (edited) 16 hours ago, Chef Jim said: I don’t see the issue with this. They insure against a risk. That’s what they do. Yes we will insure you because we’re required to. Your premiums will $12,000 a month. They price risk. It’s what they do. The issue, I think, is that the government is forcing private companies to take on customers they may prefer not to take on. Private companies know the government that can force them to take on customers who don't fit their business plan/model can also, after the fact, force them to cap their costs and absorb the losses. If there is a true need to provide high-cost home insurance to high-risk homes, someone or some company will fill that void, or people will stop buying houses in high-risk areas. 14 hours ago, Koko78 said: Oh don't worry, the followup bill will make it a guaranteed human right to have fire insurance for $12 a month. Exactly. Edited February 20, 2020 by IDBillzFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 3 hours ago, IDBillzFan said: The issue, I think, is that the government is forcing private companies to take on customers they may prefer not to take on. Private companies know the government that can force them to take on customers who don't fit their business plan/model can also, after the fact, force them to cap their costs and absorb the losses. If there is a true need to provide high-cost home insurance to high-risk homes, someone or some company will fill that void, or people will stop buying houses in high-risk areas. Oh I know the issue. As long as there is no cap on the premiums who cares? Insurance companies are masters at pricing risk. But I do see the point. Even life insurance companies will deny someone they feel is too high a risk. And people are NEVER going to stop buying houses in high risk areas. Those are typically ones in the hills with the views. They'll just go uninsured but the government needs to not bail those people out. As the preacher said in Blazing Saddles...."Son, you're on your own." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 IT’S COME TO THIS: California Bill Would Require Occupational Licenses for Porn Actors, Strippers, Cam Girls. On Tuesday, Assemblymembers Lorena Gonzalez (D–San Diego) and Christina Garcia (D–Bell Gardens) introduced Assembly Bill (A.B.) 2389. The bill would require adult entertainers and video performers, including webcam performers, to obtain a business license and complete a state-mandated training course before being allowed to ply their trade. Requirements for that training would be developed by the state’s Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), which would, in turn, be advised by a new 10-member, governor-appointed board composed of two adult film actors, three dancers, two medical doctors, a therapist, and a money manager…. Gonzalez is also the author of the controversial A.B. 5 legislation that requires many gig economy workers to be classified as employees and not independent contractors. . Did I mention.........they're crazy . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Trump signs memorandum diverting water to California’s Central Valley farms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
123719bwiqrb Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 52 minutes ago, B-Man said: Trump signs memorandum diverting water to California’s Central Valley farms That bastard. RESIST! IMPEACH!! RUSSIA!!! COW FARTS!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 1 hour ago, B-Man said: IT’S COME TO THIS: California Bill Would Require Occupational Licenses for Porn Actors, Strippers, Cam Girls. On Tuesday, Assemblymembers Lorena Gonzalez (D–San Diego) and Christina Garcia (D–Bell Gardens) introduced Assembly Bill (A.B.) 2389. The bill would require adult entertainers and video performers, including webcam performers, to obtain a business license and complete a state-mandated training course before being allowed to ply their trade. Requirements for that training would be developed by the state’s Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), which would, in turn, be advised by a new 10-member, governor-appointed board composed of two adult film actors, three dancers, two medical doctors, a therapist, and a money manager…. Gonzalez is also the author of the controversial A.B. 5 legislation that requires many gig economy workers to be classified as employees and not independent contractors. . Did I mention.........they're crazy . Who would be training them? Bill Clinton volunteers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Trump signs memorandum diverting water to California’s Central Valley farms More bigotry against the Delta Smelt. #IMPEACH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 1 hour ago, B-Man said: IT’S COME TO THIS: California Bill Would Require Occupational Licenses for Porn Actors, Strippers, Cam Girls. On Tuesday, Assemblymembers Lorena Gonzalez (D–San Diego) and Christina Garcia (D–Bell Gardens) introduced Assembly Bill (A.B.) 2389. The bill would require adult entertainers and video performers, including webcam performers, to obtain a business license and complete a state-mandated training course before being allowed to ply their trade. Requirements for that training would be developed by the state’s Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), which would, in turn, be advised by a new 10-member, governor-appointed board composed of two adult film actors, three dancers, two medical doctors, a therapist, and a money manager…. Gonzalez is also the author of the controversial A.B. 5 legislation that requires many gig economy workers to be classified as employees and not independent contractors. . Did I mention.........they're crazy . California, not satisfied with just ***** you but finds a need to teach you how to ***** others. I'm sure there's a fee in there somewhere. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts