Jump to content
whatdrought

Trade Rumors? (only Rumors)

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheFunPolice said:

 

That is great for everyone, and pretty cheap for the Bills

That’s kid of what I think. The Giants and Browns get the guy that they want anyways and pick up a bunch of assets to do so. The Bills preserve 22, 56 and 65. This trade can only work in a 3 team scenario.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moving up to 2 and selecting Allen would my my stomach churn , as opposed to any of the other 3 top QBs 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

 

 

Well, well, well...B-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said:

That’s kid of what I think. The Giants and Browns get the guy that they want anyways and pick up a bunch of assets to do so. The Bills preserve 22, 56 and 65. This trade can only work in a 3 team scenario.

 

I think that is a little light for the Browns. Giving up #1 and #4 for #2 and a couple 2nds?

 

Edit: I would swap #12 to the Browns. Giants moving back to #4 isn't worth much if they aren't taking a QB. They are still getting the guy they want bc Browns, Bills, Jets take a QB and everyone knows it.

Edited by What a Tuel
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jo39416 said:

Can you please elaborate on "that kid"?

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also just bumped the pertinent topic here on the boards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, What a Tuel said:

 

I think that is a little light for the Browns. Giving up #1 and #4 for #2 and a couple 2nds?

 

Edit: I would swap #12 to the Browns. Giants moving back to #4 isn't worth much if they aren't taking a QB. They are still getting the guy they want bc Browns, Bills, Jets take a QB and everyone knows it.

Just realized that...you are right

 

The Browns need more (and a lot more). 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, What a Tuel said:

 

I think that is a little light for the Browns. Giving up #1 and #4 for #2 and a couple 2nds?

 

The Browns would get #12 and #22 minimum I would think...

 

If the Bills pulled off getting to #1 overall and still kept #22 I think I'd faint...B-)

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope this happens, and I really hope NE trades up for a QB as well, since that would mean the end of their dynasty is closer than we thought.

 

That team is literally about Brady and Belichick. The minute one goes they drop right off. Nothing else they do matters much because BB has the system and Brady is a machine that just goes out and throws really accurate 5 yard passes to the perfect spot 99% of the time. Once that stops, their average at best roster is going to catch up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

If the Browns really prefer Allen, this is the way to go. 

 

So few on this board even have a framework for that.... (at least that I have seen)

Allen continues to be a much better fit for the Browns than the Bills. I wouldn’t fault them for taking him. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Let's not forget, Gettleman and Dorsey are 2(of few) GM's to have the most familiarity with McBeane. It is hard to believe McDermott wasn't involved in the chiefs trade last year (when Dorsey was the GM). This might have some validity!

Edited by Bills4life1924

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

That’s what I am thinking. Darnold is our guy.

Yes he is!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

So how about this:  

 

Bills get: 1st

Browns get: 2nd, 53rd and a 2019 2nd

Giants get: 4th, 12th, 96th

 

Seems like 22 would have to be in the mix. No way Browns just give away a 1st round pick and only end up with 1.

 

I think it would be:

Bills get 1

Browns get 2, 12, 53 and 2019 2nd

Giants get 4, 22 and 96

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

So how about this:  

 

Bills get: 1st

Browns get: 2nd, 53rd and a 2019 2nd

Giants get: 4th, 12th, 96th

 

 

Time to get really funky:

 

Bills get 1

Browns get 2 / Odell / Bills 19 1st 

Giants get 4 / 12 / 22

 

Giants get their 2 1sts price for Odell and Barkley at 4 instead of 2.  Brown get the same player at 2 they want at 1 and Odell & 2019 1st.  We get Darnold, the #1 guy on our board.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Wayne Cubed said:

 

Seems like 22 would have to be in the mix. No way Browns just give away a 1st round pick and only end up with 1.

 

I think it would be:

Bills get 1

Browns get 2, 12, 53 and 2019 2nd

Giants get 4, 22 and 96

It would of course have to be in the mix. Makes no sense otherwise!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Wayne Cubed said:

 

Seems like 22 would have to be in the mix. No way Browns just give away a 1st round pick and only end up with 1.

 

I think it would be:

Bills get 1

Browns get 2, 12, 53 and 2019 2nd

Giants get 4, 22 and 96

I was thinking that the Browns get 22 and the Giants get 53 and a 2019 4th.

 

Bills: 1st

Browns: 2, 12, 22 and 2019 2nd

Giants: 4, 53, 96 and 2019 4th

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

Time to get really funky:

 

Bills get 1

Browns get 2 / Odell / Bills 19 1st 

Giants get 4 / 12 / 22

 

Giants get their 2 1sts price for Odell and Barkley at 4 instead of 2.  Brown get the same player at 2 they want at 1 and Odell & 2019 1st.  We get Darnold, the #1 guy on our board.

 

 

 

 

Browns might be the least likely team to want Odell with Gordon, Landry and Coleman on the roster. But with the Browns you never know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

Time to get really funky:

 

Bills get 1

Browns get 2 / Odell / Bills 19 1st 

Giants get 4 / 12 / 22

 

Giants get their 2 1sts price for Odell and Barkley at 4 instead of 2.  Brown get the same player at 2 they want at 1 and Odell & 2019 1st.  We get Darnold, the #1 guy on our board.

 

 

 

 

That looks good to me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

Time to get really funky:

 

Bills get 1

Browns get 2 / Odell / Bills 19 1st 

Giants get 4 / 12 / 22

 

Giants get their 2 1sts price for Odell and Barkley at 4 instead of 2.  Brown get the same player at 2 they want at 1 and Odell & 2019 1st.  We get Darnold, the #1 guy on our board.

 

 

 

They just re-signed Josh Gordon, who is as talented as Beckham, and they spent 15 million per on Landry. That's not happening, I don't think ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I was thinking that the Browns get 22 and the Giants get 53 and a 2019 4th.

 

Bills: 1st

Browns: 2, 12, 22 and 2019 2nd

Giants: 4, 53, 96 and 2019 4th

 

That could work. 

 

It would have to start with the Bills trading to 1, right off the bat. They give Browns 12, 22, 53, 96 and 2019 2nd, 4th. Which is a monster trade.

 

Man this place would go nuts!

Edited by Wayne Cubed
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

They just re-signed Josh Gordon, who is as talented as Beckham, and they spent 15 million per on Landry. That's not happening, I don't think ...

I agree, but we are talking about a team who took four wide receivers in one draft just two years ago. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Figuring out trade scenarios is like trying to guess the average phone number.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

They just re-signed Josh Gordon, who is as talented as Beckham, and they spent 15 million per on Landry. That's not happening, I don't think ...

I'd feel bad for Gordon, Odell's antics might make him start drinking. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, thurst44 said:

I agree, but we are talking about a team who took four wide receivers in one draft just two years ago. 

5! They made one a TE

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×