YoloinOhio Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 (edited) Moved down 17 spots and only got one future 1st? And the the player selected was the 2nd QB off the board. Compared to what we are going to have to give up for moving up 10 spots for the 2nd QB off the board? Is Rosen considered that much better than Mahomes or was Whaley asleep! I know it is to 2 instead of 10 but we also moved to 27 instead of 12. Edited March 20, 2018 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 should have traded with a worse team like the Texans. Browns found the right partner 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffalothruMyVeins Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 The Bills also got the 91st pick in the 2017 draft, a 3rd rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 we were in what, 10 place? traded back to 27th and got a first this year. i'd say it was a good trade for us. providing Mahomes is not a true franchise qb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 20, 2018 Author Share Posted March 20, 2018 Just now, BuffalothruMyVeins said: The Bills also got the 91st pick in the 2017 draft, a 3rd rounder. Meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 But Mahomes is pretty much just like Tyrod, while trading to #2 could get us Baker Mayfield, who actually plays to win the games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 We got a 3% premium based on the new chart. Definitely in bro-deal territory, but not screwed imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 20, 2018 Author Share Posted March 20, 2018 Just now, BuffaloHokie13 said: We got a 3% premium based on the new chart. Definitely in bro-deal territory, but not screwed imo. Nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan130 Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 Here is the math for it. Bills 10th pick was worth 1300 points. Chiefs 27th pick was worth 680. Bills got the chiefs 22nd pick this year which was probably a reasonable guess without knowing where the chiefs would finish. So that pick is worth 780. 780 plus 680 was 1460 in total compared to 1300 for the 10th pick. There always seems like there is a bit of a premium, so I would say the trade was pretty fair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 20, 2018 Author Share Posted March 20, 2018 It doesn’t feel fair. I’m cranky. Carry on. You can tell I never look at charts but just seems like we should have been able to get more! Eff you Chefs. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2003Contenders Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 The "value" of picks in the first round get exponentially smaller the later you go in the round. That's why it costs more to move up, say, from 6 to 3 than it does to move up, say, 27 to 10. Then there is the notion of supply and demand. For a variety of reasons there was significantly less hype surrounding the QBs than there has been this year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 "This has been the worst trade deal in the history of trade deals, maybe ever" But seriously, nah, it's pretty much spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: It doesn’t feel fair. I’m cranky. Carry on. You can tell I never look at charts but just seems like we should have been able to get more! Eff you Chefs. had they stumbled last year, our pick from them would have been higher. crap shoot but not totally unexpected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 20, 2018 Author Share Posted March 20, 2018 1 minute ago, Foxx said: had they stumbled last year, our pick from them would have been higher. crap shoot but not totally unexpected. That 6 game swoon at mid season had my hopes up 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaattMaann Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 13 minutes ago, Chuck Wagon said: But Mahomes is pretty much just like Tyrod, while trading to #2 could get us Baker Mayfield, who actually plays to win the games. huh? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CuddyDark Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 Outside the top ten is always less value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 7 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: That 6 game swoon at mid season had my hopes up i think Reid is stuck in the Schottenheimer mold. great coach, just not great enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrEpsYtown Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 Dorsey owes us one. Maybe there is a wink wink nod nod there. Maybe that's why we got a third for Tyrod? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 17 minutes ago, Foxx said: we were in what, 10 place? traded back to 27th and got a first this year. i'd say it was a good trade for us. providing Mahomes is not a true franchise qb. The real question is whether you felt whaley was qualified to make that decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royale with Cheese Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 20 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Moved down 17 spots and only got one future 1st? And the the player selected was the 2nd QB off the board. Compared to what we are going to have to give up for moving up 10 spots for the 2nd QB off the board? Is Rosen considered that much better than Mahomes or was Whaley asleep! I know it is to 2 instead of 10 but we also moved to 27 instead of 12. I don't think if memory serves me correct that Mahomes was a late 1st/2nd round prospect for awhile. Rosen has been a top 5 prospect for the last 2 years. I'm thinking that Rosen was considered that much of a better prospect but just a guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts