Jump to content

Do you think our GM & HC are CRAZY!!!


Punt75

Recommended Posts

Everybody seems to be caught up in the DRAMA of trading up in the draft.  Do you really think our level headed GM & HC will do that???  It’s a crazy thought – crazy!

We have 2 #1’s, 2#2’s, 2#3’s - - that’s 6 players in the top 100 picks.   

 

The TEAM needs WR’s, OL’s, LB’s, another DL.  Take the best QB left at #12 or #22 (Mayfield, Jackson or Rudolph) and let McCarron start.  Build a solid, competitive team for years to come with these picks!  This isn't crazy!
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Punt75 said:

Everybody seems to be caught up in the DRAMA of trading up in the draft.  Do you really think our level headed GM & HC will do that???  It’s a crazy thought – crazy!

We have 2 #1’s, 2#2’s, 2#3’s - - that’s 6 players in the top 100 picks.   

 

 

The TEAM needs WR’s, OL’s, LB’s, another DL.  Take the best QB left at #12 or #22 (Mayfield, Jackson or Rudolph) and let McCarron start.  Build a solid, competitive team for years to come with these picks!  This isn't crazy!

It's not that simple. They don't have a proven starting caliber QB on the roster. They traded the one they had for a pretty substantial pick. They have a huge need at QB that trumps all others. There are probably 4 QBs in this draft that they have a first round grade on. Two will be gone by the time pick 4 is on the clock. Do they wait for late in round one to take a QB they have a second round grade on? If they don't somebody will. Pick 22 might even be too late, though that would be largely unprecedented. 

  Their first priority is pretty clearly getting a starting QB. It's not crazy to think a move up is coming. It's probably required. They tried and were bested by a team with more to offer. The quest continues....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

 

So they already traded up?

Yes, but to gain draft pick capital, not to spend it. Essentially Cordy Glenn for a mid 2nd rounder

Edited by Fetou
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

Would you have thought it were crazy if we were able to sell the farm and move up and get Eli, Rivers, or Big Ben instead of settling for Losman? 

good point. talent laden teams with crap QBs are a dime a dozen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

 

So they already traded up?

They got Cinci's #12 pick in exchange for Glenn and our 21st, plus the swapping of our 5th rounder for their 6th rounder. It was kind of a big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BuffaninATL said:

They got Cinci's #12 pick in exchange for Glenn and our 21st, plus the swapping of our 5th rounder for their 6th rounder. It was kind of a big deal.

 

I know.

But apparently the OP missed since he is writing saying the GM and Head Coach are not crazy and wouldn't trade up in the draft.

 

*Hint*

They already did.

1 minute ago, Fetou said:

They've only drafted a QB with a 1st round pick twice if I'm not mistaken? 

 

And neither were with great confidence.

 

JP was the 4th QB taken and a panic move.

EJ they actually traded away from and down a few spots before taking him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

 

I know.

But apparently the OP missed since he is writing saying the GM and Head Coach are not crazy and wouldn't trade up in the draft.

 

*Hint*

They already did.

This is intentionally misleading though. The OP is arguing that they won't give up a bunch of picks to get one pick. As in, he is saying it would be crazy to consolidate multiple top 60 picks into one pick. The Glenn trade up was converting a veteran player into what is essentially extra draft pick position. One move is in line with  team building through the draft (and in the same vein as trading Watkins and Darby), and the other move would shift a good portion of the team building into future free agency.

Edited by Fetou
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fetou said:

This is intentionally misleading though. The OP is arguing that they won't give up a bunch of picks to get one pick. As in, he is saying it would be crazy to consolidate multiple top 60 picks into one pick. The Glenn trade up was converting a player into what is essentially extra draft pick position. One move is in line with  team building through the draft (and in the same vein as trading Watkins and Darby), and the other move would shift a good portion of the team building into future free agency.

 

Maybe you should have written this thread.  I also understaood what his original point is, but his position is poorly worded.  As it stands, it comes off like the philosophy of trading up would make them nuts.

Edited by RalphWilson'sNewWar
correction
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...