par73 Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Browns are taking a QB at #1. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills4life1924 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Share Posted March 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Bangarang said: If you were GM of the Browns would you trade out of #1 knowing you can just stay put and pick the top QB and still have a boatload of draft picks to fill out your roster? The answer is no. It all depends. Do they view 1 qb higher than the others? Or do they have them all in 1 tier? By picking up even more high end draft picks trading out of #1. They take qb at #4, and have all the ammunition to trade up for guys they want. They could move all over the draft board with all those picks. So to answer your question, yes I would but ONLY if they don't have 1 qb rated higher than the others Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Just now, Bills4life1924 said: It all depends. Do they view 1 qb higher than the others? Or do they have them all in 1 tier? By picking up even more high end draft picks trading out of #1. They take qb at #4, and have all the ammunition to trade up for guys they want. They could move all over the draft board with all those picks. So to answer your question, yes I would but ONLY if they don't have 1 qb rated higher than the others I gave you the answer and you still managed to get it wrong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills4life1924 Posted March 17, 2018 Author Share Posted March 17, 2018 6 minutes ago, Bangarang said: I gave you the answer and you still managed to get it wrong. You like my answer and you know it!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate Angel Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 55 minutes ago, Bills4life1924 said: I wrote about this in a couple other threads. But instead of voicing a possibility 10x's in 10 threads, this is the only reason for starting a new thread for the same topic. So many people are assuming the browns are taking a qb 1st overall. Which brings me to this... The browns already named their starter. If u take a qb 1st overall, why would u not let him compete for the job? I understand u may want to sit him for a year, ect... But why not ATLEAST let the top overall pick in the draft compete for the job in camp? They also signed Carlos hyde. So maybe the browns value draft picks over barkley. Maybe the browns will trade back (esp since they already own pick #4) for high draft picks and fill their roster with top end talent. I'm not saying they won't select a qb with 1st pick(I also think they will), but just another possibility to think about. You'd have to give up a kings ransom...unless your without a doubt getting a future HOF...it's not even worth considering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Hamburg Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 This is still an option 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 45 minutes ago, Bangarang said: Try using common sense. It will tell you that we aren’t trading for the top pick. I can’t believe some of you are even wasting time entertaining the idea. Did I ever say we were trading for the #1 pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Chuck Wagon said: While trading pick #1 for pick #12 and lower picks and instilling Tyrod & Hyde as your backfield of now and the future is a very browns thing to do, it's not something to realistically think could happen. Yeah but the Browns still have the #4 pick so they could get the 3rd QB off the board, there was a rumor they wanted Allen, so they made the trade with Buffalo and part of the trade is we don't take Allan and give them our 2 first rounds plus additional. That gives the Browns a QB at 4 plus 12 and 22. Or take the Browns 4th pick you're still getting the 3rd highest ranked QB which every day of the week it's a different person anyway ranked highest. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobobonators Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Can we trade to pick number 0? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Bangarang said: If there is a franchise guy at 1 why would the Browns trade the pick? Your answer better not include the words Tyrod or Taylor. TT. I win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmanfan Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 If Beane decides one of them is the guy he has to have, trading to 1 is the way to guarantee getting him 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts