Jump to content

In your hindsight, 2017: go all out to win, or tank?


boater

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, nucci said:

I never said the Bills were winners. I said I prefer winning over losing

agreed but we have been going no place by doing neither - and one cannot just decide to start winning and so that leaves losing and building as the logical choice.  2017 was a great year to have tried that.  Yes, the sabers and the browns - but also many examples of it working.  .500 is a curse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am happy we made the playoffs and it was definitely climactic when the Bungholes helped us, but winning/overachieving leaves you a 7-9 or 8-8 team the next year and so on. We need to suck during good draft years, but we always win just enough to miss out on superstars. Buffalo is destine to be mediocre unless we continue the cleansing. We are drafting like the 1995 Bills and it took us 4 more years to get back to the Playoffs and we had a great core. We need to continue building up the middle on defense and offense!

 

Losing could have been what made this year exciting. Now I have expectations! I was so much happier knowing we would lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sleeby said:

agreed but we have been going no place by doing neither - and one cannot just decide to start winning and so that leaves losing and building as the logical choice.  2017 was a great year to have tried that.  Yes, the sabers and the browns - but also many examples of it working.  .500 is a curse.

yet we made the playoffs last year. Have 5 picks in first 3 rounds to improve the team.  How about we look forward to improving and winning more instead of losing for higher picks? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, K-GunJimKelly12 said:

What are football and sports all about?  Yes it is about winning it all, but for me it is also about those few moments where you can see something incredible happen and make you jump out of your seat.  I still watch Drury's goal in game 4 Vs. the Rangers from the playoffs 10 years ago.  The Pominville goal Vs. the Sens to clinch the series I still watch sometimes too.

 

Jumping up and down and celebrating with my brother after Tyler Boyd scored that TD is one of the happiest sports moments I have had in awhile.  I watched that play several times and videos of Bills fans celebrating even more.  For me, there is no way I would trade that moment for a high draft pick this year.  I could be dead tomorrow (I'm knocking on wood now) and what would that draft pick mean to me then?  I'll take the moment and the great feelings of the week that followed, thank you very much sir.

 

Also 17 years without the playoffs was an albatross hanging over this team and city.  That being gone is worth it alone.  It was an embarrassment to all Bills fans and I believe the way we came out of the drought and the entire country seeing how much the Bills fans care and how grateful we were to the team and Andy Dalton, make us more attractive than we would be otherwise to players who may be thinking about coming here in free agency.  

 

Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sleeby said:

agreed but we have been going no place by doing neither - and one cannot just decide to start winning and so that leaves losing and building as the logical choice.  2017 was a great year to have tried that.  Yes, the sabers and the browns - but also many examples of it working.  .500 is a curse.

 

Name three ... and the Colts getting Luck doesn't count ... they were a play-off team before Manning got hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How exciting was the end of last season? We had a family friend die of cancer shortly after the season ended. You how much joy this season, team brought him? We all felt it. We still have all these draft picks. I wouldn't trade that for anything. From believing we were tanking to a spot in the playoffs. If anyone believes that was a wasted season, I feel sorry for them. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, macaroni said:

 

Name three ... and the Colts getting Luck doesn't count ... they were a play-off team before Manning got hurt.

The colts count - 0-16 after manning broke his neck and then moved on.

 

I am NOT the sports statistician type!  At a quick glance if one counts 4 wins as a lousy year and then building up within a three or so years to championship game else SB appearance.

 

Atl: 2013 --> 2016

Phil 2012 --->2017

Seattle 2008 --> 2013

Jax : 2012/13/14/15/16 --> 2017.  :o)

 

Seems going low is an effective plan - and looking at the bills perenial mediocrity 50-50 is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sleeby said:

The colts count - 0-16 after manning broke his neck and then moved on.

 

I am NOT the sports statistician type!  At a quick glance if one counts 4 wins as a lousy year and then building up within a three or so years to championship game else SB appearance.

 

Atl: 2013 --> 2016

Phil 2012 --->2017

Seattle 2008 --> 2013

Jax : 2012/13/14/15/16 --> 2017.  :o)

 

Seems going low is an effective plan - and looking at the bills perenial mediocrity 50-50 is not.

Then go ahead and hope we lose. Most everyone else is looking forward to an exciting draft and another playoff berth. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, boater said:

When you see the countless posts looking to sell the estate to trade up and draft that magical "franchise" QB, -- it makes you wonder: maybe deliberate tanking would have been a wise approach to the 2017 season. (given the Watkins and Darby trades, one can argue the tank was on)

 

If the Bills tanked: we wouldn't be talking about trading multiple first rounders plus other picks/players for a shot at Darnold, Rosen, Mayfield et al. We'd be talking about which to choose with our naturally given draft choice.

 

What happened: the Bills played balls to the wall. I believe they exceeded their potential and got lucky. They made the playoffs and earned a less than mid-first round draft pick.

 

Would you have rather tanked (and pick a franchise QB without selling the farm), or made the playoffs?

 

Me? I'm glad the Bills went all-in and made the playoffs, that goes so far in building a winning culture for the future. Also I look at the Sabres suckitude and can't help but feel once you tank, it's hard to wash the stench of losing out of the locker room.

 

 

No question winning was more important.

 

This isn't MLB where you can control young players for a decade after you draft/sign them so there is no great incentive in tanking and trying to stack talent in the NFL.

 

Even in the unlikely event that they all pan out the salary cap robs you of a good share of your talent in short order with rookie contracts now basically all being 4 year deals(with very expensive 5th year options on 1st rounders that a lot of teams are now declining).

 

The key to sustained competitiveness is getting a franchise QB and the Bills have PLENTY of ammunition to go get their guy if they want to.    No tank job necessary.

 

Yeah,  it doesn't feel good to not have first round picks during the draft but as I've said many times in the past few months......the Bills have almost nothing to show for nearly two decades of first round picks since they passed on Drew Brees.    

 

3D White and Shaq.

 

That's it.

 

And in that time they've never just stayed put and drafted a QB in round one or traded up to select one with their first pick.    

 

Disgusting but true.   And if you can win 9 games with almost no help from 2 decades worth of mostly-early first round picks then just how important was it to not just have used EVERY first round pick in an effort to get a franchise QB?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Balls to the walls boys. 

 

Just in the last 2 FA signings Ivory and Davis have made reference to us being a playoff team. That does help sell a franchise to free agents that would normally say Buffalo is not for them.

 

It also shows that McDermott has the team trending in the right direction. Makes it easier for FA and rookies to buy into him as a winner. Credibility goes a long way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The playoff drought was a dark cloud hanging over the entire franchise. 

Every new GM, coach and player immediately had the tremendous pressure of trying to break that streak.  And now it's over.

 

Based on the estimates being thrown around, a trade-up (into the Top 5) will ultimately cost us about 3-4 early picks.  So the difference between already being in the Top 5 and needing to trade up is approximately 3 potential starters at other positions.  In the end, you are sacrificing one season of rebuilding for the joy of making the playoffs this year.  Instead of becoming a legitimate contender in 2019, you are probably looking at 2020.

 

To me, that extra year is worth it.

 

Edited by mjt328
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sleeby said:

The colts count - 0-16 after manning broke his neck and then moved on.

 

I am NOT the sports statistician type!  At a quick glance if one counts 4 wins as a lousy year and then building up within a three or so years to championship game else SB appearance.

 

Atl: 2013 --> 2016

Phil 2012 --->2017

Seattle 2008 --> 2013

Jax : 2012/13/14/15/16 --> 2017.  :o)

 

Seems going low is an effective plan - and looking at the bills perenial mediocrity 50-50 is not.

 

Nooooo .... don't just look at teams with BAD years ... look at teams who were potentially "tanking". For arguments sake ... the teams who ended up as the bottom 2 per year, because if your tanking and end up any higher you are even bad at tanking.

 

2011 ... Colts 2-14 ... previous year they were 10-6, next year they were 11-5 (this year Manning had a bad neck)

              Rams 2-11

 

2012 ... Jags 2-14

               KC 2-14 ... next year they were 11-5 (fits your premise)

 

2013 ... Hou 2-14

              Wash 3-13

 

2014 ... TB 2-14

               Tenn 2-14

 

2015 ... Cleve 3-13

              Tenn 3-13

 

2016 ... Cleve 1-15

              SF 2-14

 

2017 ... Cleve 0-16

              NYG 3-13

 

IMHO ending up on the bottom of the league means you stink ... NOT ... that you are building the immediate future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To "tank," the strategy from the coach on down has to be to try and lose games.  Does anyone logically think that a coach will tell his team to try to lose?  He'd be at great risk for not only being fired but also not looking all that good in competing for other positions.  Individual players are not going to intentionally play poorly (unless, of course, their being bribed or are simply lazy) as it hurts their image and employability and damages their chances for pay increases and bonuses.  Teams don't tank!  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...