Jump to content

Completion % And How It Translates To The Pros


Like A Mofo

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

Generally speaking you shouldn't bother looking at college stats as a way of projecting how a QB will do in the NFL.

Unless they play in a friendly system designed for success yet only complete 57% of their passes.

 

Also, for college completion % it’s not really translatable if the % is high (Tebow, Manuel). It’s usually if the college % is low (Vick, Leaf).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

What do you suggest then?  Ouija board?

 

 

No.

 

Look at mechanics, footwork and decision-making skills.  Look at work ethic.  If the Wonderlic score is 15 or less, pass on the kid.

 

None of these QBs are facing NFL defenses.  Most of them aren't facing more than 2-3 future NFL defensemen in any given game.  Most of them are throwing the ball to receivers who won't sniff the NFL.  This is why college stats are worthless.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jay_Fixit said:

Exactly.

 

Just now, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

That's kind of my take on the subject - again, with the caveat I am not a watcher of college football.

 

Which is why drafting a qb is so hard. There are college systems that will inflate stats but doesn't translate to the pros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Jay_Fixit said:

Unless they play in a friendly system designed for success yet only complete 57% of their passes.

 

Also, for college completion % it’s not really translatable if the % is high (Tebow, Manuel). It’s usually if the college % is low (Vick, Leaf).

 

True.

 

There are thresholds. Most guys who complete fewer than 59% of their throws in their final year of college ever amount to anything in the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Gugny said:

Look at mechanics, footwork and decision-making skills.  Look at work ethic.  If the Wonderlic score is 15 or less, pass on the kid.

 

None of these QBs are facing NFL defenses.  Most of them aren't facing more than 2-3 future NFL defensemen in any given game.  Most of them are throwing the ball to receivers who won't sniff the NFL.  This is why college stats are worthless.

 

 

I wonder (ha!) how well the Wonderlic really predicts the kind of learning the QBs in the NFL need to do.

 

Footwork and mechanics are straightforward and can be evaluated from film, sure.

 

But doesn't the fact that the QB aren't facing NFL defenses make it all the more important that they should have a reasonable completion percentage?  How do you evaluate a guy's decision making skills if he's not able to throw completions?  I mean, come on, almost all these receivers can catch and as you say, against lower-quality defenses at least one of them can get open 2/3 of the plays - the reason for the phrase "college open"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course you can't rely purely on statistics; you need to watch what these players are doing and see the games.

 

Especially at the college level, it seems like you will often see a long throw for a TD.  Looks great on the stat sheet for the QB and the WR.

 

In reality, the ball was grossly under thrown and totally undefended by a CB who will never touch the NFL...the DB gets all turned around and lost in space, the WR comes back to the ball, catches it, and runs in for a TD.

 

If you only go by stats, this might look like a 65 yard completion for a TD.


In the NFL, it's an interception.

 

Forget the stats!  You have to use your eyes to see what is happening; the game is much more complex than stats allow for.

 

 

Another favorite of mine: college QB drops back, stares down #1 receiver, then throws to wide open #1 receiver for a completion when #1 receiver uses huge talent mismatch to get 5 yards open on bad DB who will never be drafted into the NFL.

 

This all looks good on the stat sheet.  In reality, the QB has shown you NOTHING that is of value in the NFL and in fact he may be showing you bad traits that won't work in the NFL.


You have to see what is happening on the field.

 

 

Edited by Fadingpain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SouthNYfan said:

Brett Favre!

52-54% college

64% NFL if I remember right

 

The college game has changed dramatically since he played 28 years ago...

 

There are a handful of guys who improved their accuracy over the past 30 years. Not great odds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's a nice stat, not meant to represent 100% of an honest and objective review

 

there are so many other factors to consider which can totally flip this stat on its head

 

but why are you doing this?  for your fantasy team projections?  to finally defeat your brother-in-law who insists that Brady was twice the QB Jim Kelly was?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Like A Mofo said:

Just remember one thing about accuracy and how it translates from college to the NFL, it does not always show an indication on how accurate a QB will be in the NFL

 

1. EJ Manuel had a 66.9% completion percentage at Florida State for his career. Way Off.

2. Aaron Rodgers had a 63.8% completion percentage at Cal in his two seasons in the Pac-12, Aaron exceeded this.

3. Tim Tebow had a 66.4% completion percentage in his Florida career. Way off.

4. Peyton Manning had a 62.5% completion percentage in his 4 years at Tennessee, Peyton exceeded this in the Pros.

5. Big Ben had a 65.5% completion percentage at Miami (OH), that was a good indicator.

6. Matthew Stafford was a 57.1% passer for Georgia in his career. Stafford completed 65.7% this year for the Lions. Way off.

7. Matt Ryan was a 59.9% passer for his career at Boston College. In the Altanta offense, Ryan has drastically improved that number. Way off.

 

College completion percentage is not an exact science. It is a skill that can be improved on, based on the system, coaching, and talent around that QB.

 

And it can fool NFL scouts and coaches like we did with EJ and not indicate fully what that player can do in the pros.

 

Whats so funny to me is people still use Completion Percentage to explain accuracy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I wonder (ha!) how well the Wonderlic really predicts the kind of learning the QBs in the NFL need to do.

 

Footwork and mechanics are straightforward and can be evaluated from film, sure.

 

But doesn't the fact that the QB aren't facing NFL defenses make it all the more important that they should have a reasonable completion percentage?  How do you evaluate a guy's decision making skills if he's not able to throw completions?  I mean, come on, almost all these receivers can catch and as you say, against lower-quality defenses at least one of them can get open 2/3 of the plays - the reason for the phrase "college open"

 

The Wonderlic has actually done very well predicting how likely a QB is to be a failure in the NFL.  Since 2000, not one QB who's scored 15 or lower has had a successful career as a starter.  Not one.

 

That does not mean that one who scores 16 or higher WILL have a successful career as a starter (see:  Ryan Fitzpatrick).

 

It means that one who scores 15 or less will DEFINITELY NOT be good.

It means that one who scores 16 or more MIGHT be good.

 

*** Please note the 2000 cut off.  Inevitably, whenever I put this out there, some yokel says, "oh yeah?  Well Jim Kelly only scored a 14 on his!!!"  Yes ... I know ...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SouthNYfan said:

Brett Favre!

52-54% college

64% NFL if I remember right

 

61.4% in his first gig, but your point still stands.

 

Wonder if Favre is the "traded to a place where the bars close early" exception.

5 minutes ago, row_33 said:

it's a nice stat, not meant to represent 100% of an honest and objective review

there are so many other factors to consider which can totally flip this stat on its head

but why are you doing this?  for your fantasy team projections?  to finally defeat your brother-in-law who insists that Brady was twice the QB Jim Kelly was?

 

I'm having trouble parsing this post.  What are you talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

The college game has changed dramatically since he played 28 years ago...

 

There are a handful of guys who improved their accuracy over the past 30 years. Not great odds. 

 

Oh I know!!

 

Earlier somebody said they would like to see some QBs who had sub60% in college, and translated to better in NFL.

My earlier post even said that the game has changed a lot, so it's not really a good example, just an example of sub 60% college who succeeded :)

 

Favre was the only real anomaly I could find.

It was just a statistical fact finding mission, not saying he's the norm :)

4 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

61.4% in his first gig, but your point still stands.

 

Wonder if Favre is the "traded to a place where the bars close early" exception.

 

 

I think you're right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Butler used to appear on local radio and always made it clear that they track these player at their practices and games for years but really liked to watch them perform

against the best opposition. That is why so talent evaluators many like to watch the Senior Bowl practices.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dneveu said:

 

Not many - and most of them don't come from spread attacks.  Someone put this list together and its pretty damning.  Taylors the only one on the entire list to go above 60% in the pros... and it wasn't even with the team who drafted him.  

 

 

 

Yeah the 60% completion % college stat is good starting spot... From there you need to determine the system / Coach style, field reads, arm strength, measurables (hand size) surrounding talent, and level of competition etc... but that 60% is significant

Edited by ddaryl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some other 26-27-60 grades (comp% trend)

 

Tyrod 15-38-57 (57-56-59.7) close his senior year

Teddy B  20-37-68 (64-68-71) great % in L'ville O, low Wonderlic like TT

Cousins  33-39-64 (60-66-63) wonder if this regression hurt him in draft

A.Smith  40-23-66   interesting case, very smart, only 2 yr starter for Urban

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a "drill" they need to invent if they haven't done so already.

 

Take a QB candidate at the combine and make him do 3 mental activities at once.

 

Respond verbally to audible commands, while arranging words in alphabetical order, and changing which chair he is seated in when told to do so.  Just process information all at the same time. 


See who can do it.

 

The best fighter pilots and race car drivers have a tremendous ability to multi-task in this manner.  

 

Seems to me the best NFL QBs in 2018 need to be able to do this too. 

 

Has anyone in the football community even thought of this sort of test?  They seem to busy measuring a guy's standing broad jump.

 

:lol:

Edited by Fadingpain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...