Jump to content

CFB playoff rankings


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, row_33 said:

It’s good and bad to face your first real opponent Nov 11.

 

 

 

Eh, Alabama seems to do that every year.  Usually it works out for them;  as long as they don't lose twice in Nov they are gauranteed a playoff spot.

 

Looks like it's Bama, OU, Clemson and Miami for now, thought  Wisconsin should replace Clemson if they run the table.  Also gets interesting if the Canes lose to Georgia.

 

Edited by KD in CA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

Not soon enough.

 

I want a 32 team tournament and the end of the bowls.

That’s a lot of teams. I’m never a fan of some BS team getting hot at the end and winning it all like some WC teams in the NFL, it cheapens the regular season.

 

With 8 teams, just about everyone who is worthy gets a shot at winning it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Rico said:

That’s a lot of teams. I’m never a fan of some BS team getting hot at the end and winning it all like some WC teams in the NFL, it cheapens the regular season.

 

With 8 teams, just about everyone who is worthy gets a shot at winning it all.

 

Football isn't like the basketball tournament, if you beat 5 quality teams to win the championship then you deserve it.

Edited by Buffalo Barbarian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

Football isn't like basketball, if you beat 5 quality teams to win the championship then you deserve it.

If you're 8-4 (or worse) and beat 5 quality teams to win the championship,

you may be the champions but you're not a great team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Augie said:

What year do you think they go to 8 teams? 

 

Hopefully, never.

A better case scenario would be to drop the whole playoff format and go back to the BCS.

 

For everybody who wants to expand the playoffs to include more teams, nobody has yet to explain how adding even more crappier teams would make it better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Cynical said:

 

Hopefully, never.

A better case scenario would be to drop the whole playoff format and go back to the BCS.

 

For everybody who wants to expand the playoffs to include more teams, nobody has yet to explain how adding even more crappier teams would make it better.

 

Or back to the original bowl format with traditional conference bowl commitments.  For all the whining, there was a definitive national champ almost every year under the old system.

 

That one year it would have been great to have a Washington/Miami game but otherwise it was always settled on the field from my recollection.   Seems like there have been even more controversies since the BCS thing started.

Edited by KD in CA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cynical said:

 

Hopefully, never.

A better case scenario would be to drop the whole playoff format and go back to the BCS.

 

For everybody who wants to expand the playoffs to include more teams, nobody has yet to explain how adding even more crappier teams would make it better.

Four is perfect.  Given the disparity of competition between the different conferences you'll see a lot of undefeated teams seeded #1 or 2 be dominated in the semifinals by a team from a better conference with a loss in the future.  That gives you the best shot of pitting the two best teams in the league against each other for the championship while preserving the importance of the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There always is a chance of a controversy, but isn't it more likely that the top team in the country will be one of the top "ranked" teams and will be in the playoff (than the previous system)?

Edited by Peter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cynical said:

 

Hopefully, never.

A better case scenario would be to drop the whole playoff format and go back to the BCS.

 

For everybody who wants to expand the playoffs to include more teams, nobody has yet to explain how adding even more crappier teams would make it better.

 

Um, other teams besides Alabama have a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...