Royale with Cheese Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Very interesting.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Why Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Very interesting. Dont know why he wouldnt be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Trade on the horizon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 He's non-committal on every subject in his post game pressers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Trade Tank on the horizon? If they pull the trigger on this, it will be unrefutable... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 If they pull the trigger on this, it will be unrefutable...unless it's for a WR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Hmmm, thats an odd statement to make. Dawkins played like a rookie today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Trade on the horizon? No ones trading anything valuable for a high priced guy that isn't on the field after injury He's good and should be our starter without question if healthy though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 unless it's for a WR With our QB situation, a healthy LT > WR... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramza86 Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Thats a pretty crazy comment...because i keep praying for his return Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 With our QB situation, a healthy LT > WR...i don't think they are really looking at just this year's QB situation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaviorPeterman Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Like I said earlier this week when it came up, if we can unload Glenn and his contract and get a player of need in return we'd be stupid not to do it especially if we want to keep any faint playoff hope alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Like I said earlier this week when it came up, if we can unload Glenn and his contract and get a player of need in return we'd be stupid not to do it especially if we want to keep any faint playoff hope alive. You are hilarious. Peterman at QB and trade Glenn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 i don't think they are really looking at just this year's QB situation Not having a viable LT is a problem for a rookie QB as well. Can't address one problem by creating a second one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Not having a viable LT is a problem for a rookie QB as well. Can't address one problem by creating a second one...i assume they would replace him with Dawkins. Didn't have a good game today but showing a lot of potential. Also Seantrel returns for depth. Again I like Cordy, wasn't really for the trade earlier this week, not sure I am even now.... but it makes some sense given the long term Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 i assume they would replace him with Dawkins. Didn't have a good game today but showing a lot of potential. Also Seantrel returns for depth. Again I like Cordy, wasn't really for the trade earlier this week, not sure I am even now.... but it makes some sense given the long term I'll disagree on Dawkins. More and more, he looks like a RT to me. As is Henderson, assuming he can re-start his career... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Like I said earlier this week when it came up, if we can unload Glenn and his contract and get a player of need in return we'd be stupid not to do it especially if we want to keep any faint playoff hope alive. My God! Why are you so eager to get rid of Glenn? As for McDermott being non-committal, my guess would be that he is doing that because Glenn is not 100% yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royale with Cheese Posted October 8, 2017 Author Share Posted October 8, 2017 My God! Why are you so eager to get rid of Glenn? As for McDermott being non-committal, my guess would be that he is doing that because Glenn is not 100% yet. The question was when Glenn is healthy, is he the starting LT. McDermott said that would be evaluated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 The question was when Glenn is healthy, is he the starting LT. McDermott said that would be evaluated. Sounds like a typical non-answer answer from a head coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts