BringBackOrton Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 I thought so, too. I see it has continued in the UK. He's truly "other worldly" aint he? Is he hurt? Because EJ Gaines is hurt for what seems like the 7th time in 7 weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Why is dolphins-jets on fox? o.O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Why is dolphins-jets on fox? o.O Because Bears Panthers were on CBS. Welcome to the new TV rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Is he hurt? Because EJ Gaines is hurt for what seems like the 7th time in 7 weeks. No, sammy isn't hurt, he's just irrelevant to their offense for the most part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Is he hurt? Because EJ Gaines is hurt for what seems like the 7th time in 7 weeks. weak though he's contributed more to his team than your boyfriend sammy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 (edited) No, sammy isn't hurt, he's just irrelevant to their offense for the most part. Can you be more irrelevant than a guy in the locker room? weak though he's contributed more to his team than your boyfriend sammy Would be the leading WR on the Bills right now. Edited October 22, 2017 by jmc12290 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Nick OLeary > Watkins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Can you be more irrelevant than a guy in the locker room? Would be the leading WR on the Bills right now. He's. Not. Contributing. Is this not true? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 He's. Not. Contributing. Is this not true? No, it's not. His yards and TD's count. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Nick OLeary > Watkins. Well - yes. Nick's contributions were notable. No, it's not. His yards and TD's count. Yep - he's been a real difference maker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Well - yes. Nick's contributions were notable. Yep - he's been a real difference maker. Again, he'd be the Bills leading WR with his numbers. And the player he was traded for hasn't played a full game without getting hurt yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Watkins had more catches than Woods over 2014 and 2015. Don't get me wrong, I love Woods and think consistency is important. But no one cares if Tyreek Hill is a mediocre run blocker when he takes it to the house. Woods is limited in that role. Completely respect that opinion. I just don't get why Watkins isn't more involved. I see he got some catches today though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Again, he'd be the Bills leading WR with his numbers. And the player he was traded for hasn't played a full game without getting hurt yet. You're reaching - and that's ok. I know you miss him. Look, the way things are going, he'll be a FA. His numbers will be so pedestrian we might actually be able to get him at a good price. We could use a decoy. Wait - scratch that. He's not in our plan. We knew this a while ago, didn't we. Good thing he's easily replaceable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarlinTheMagician Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 3 for 42. Sammy not a part of the scoring, and a small part of the offense even today. Eeesh. Deonte! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 (edited) You're reaching - and that's ok. I know you miss him. Look, the way things are going, he'll be a FA. His numbers will be so pedestrian we might actually be able to get him at a good price. We could use a decoy. Wait - scratch that. He's not in our plan. We knew this a while ago, didn't we. Good thing he's easily replaceable. Huh? We haven't replaced him at WR yet. The rest of your post had zero substance. White flag city bro. Check the numbers and get back to me. Edited October 22, 2017 by jmc12290 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Deonte Thompson is not a decoy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill_with_it Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Deonte Thompson is not a decoy.He wasnt today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted October 23, 2017 Share Posted October 23, 2017 Huh? We haven't replaced him at WR yet. The rest of your post had zero substance. White flag city bro. Check the numbers and get back to me. still yappin' about 'ol Bill Sammy? Is Sammy elite or what? Get over him. We're winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts