Jump to content

DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal


Recommended Posts

There's no legal or ethical reason for him to recuse. None. The only reason he'd recuse is because he gave in to political pressure. 

 

I don't see that happening. But if he did, Noel would come next, and he'd be a nightmare for the people who are terrified of Whitaker right now. It's very much a "if you remove Trump you still have Pence" scenario.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just restating: G-Pap is not as innocent of an actor in all this as he's trying to portray on Twitter... that aside, this is correct information that has been overlooked by almost everyone (but this thread) since Haspel's appointment. 

 

 

Look back to how this administration dealt with Langley from their very first day: 

* Trump's first speech is at Langley, with General Flynn by his side, in front of the wall of honor. Where he made this audacious "joke" at the end:

 

 

* Pompeo was installed and he immediately fired (and firewalled) swaths of people at both Langley and State (no one ever reports the overlap, because: spies). Haspel is moved to London during this same time period, just in time to be in London while Peter Strzok, Bill Priestap, were meeting with Christopher Steele - and Downer, Dearlove, Halper and British intelligence. 

 

* Pompeo steps down, Haspel is nominated and immediately takes friendly fire from current and former Brennan/Clapper hires about her record on torture. This friendly fire included erroneous (and later retracted) stories about how she was overseeing the torture programs. Despite this, she's easily confirmed. 

 

Make of all that what you will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

(Will he live to make it to the hearing?)

 

He may be suicidal. Hopefully he doesn't succumb to his demons and shoot himself in the back of the head, twice, during a mugging where nothing is taken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

He may be suicidal. Hopefully he doesn't succumb to his demons and shoot himself in the back of the head, twice, during a mugging where nothing is taken.

 

Interesting that he picked the Senate to testify before, rather than the House. 

 

Also interesting that the DNC made statements he was dead a few months ago... 

 

Dr5qKafWoAA6yDZ.jpg

 

Things that make me go "hmmm". 

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Interesting that he picked the Senate to testify before, rather than the House. 

 

Also interesting that the DNC made statements he was dead a few months ago... 

 

Dr5qKafWoAA6yDZ.jpg

 

Things that make me go "hmmm". 

 

Is that Nick Kroll?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Interesting that he picked the Senate to testify before, rather than the House. 

 

Also interesting that the DNC made statements he was dead a few months ago... 

 

Dr5qKafWoAA6yDZ.jpg

 

Things that make me go "hmmm". 

 

The DNC did not make statements Mifsud was dead. Lawyers for the DNC said... “with the exception of Mifsud (who is missing and may be deceased).”

 

 

 

missing and may be deceased is far, far away from IS DEAD!

Edited by peace out
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, peace out said:

 

The DNC did not make statements Mifsud was dead. Lawyers for the DNC said... “with the exception of Mifsud (who is missing and may be deceased).”

 

 

 

missing and may be deceased is far, far away from IS DEAD!

 

Liberal hair-splitting is so weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, peace out said:

 

The DNC did not make statements Mifsud was dead. Lawyers for the DNC said... “with the exception of Mifsud (who is missing and may be deceased).”

 

 

 

missing and may be deceased is far, far away from IS DEAD!

 

Don't you find it odd that the lawyers for the DNC are making the kind of statements you might expect from the lawyers for the Gambinos?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

 

Don't you find it odd that the lawyers for the DNC are making the kind of statements you might expect from the lawyers for the Gambinos?

You must have a good brain in your head to make astute observations like that.  It would be a shame if it accidentally got smashed in with a pipe wrench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

DOJ just announced Whittaker's appointment is legal. He can serve for at least 210 days without confirmation and does not have to recuse. 

 

Get ready for the media and left to attack the DOJ now. After two years of calling such tactics unamerican. 

https://mobile.twitter.com/WSJ/status/1062722630539730944

Well duh, but that's not the issue. The corrupt nature of all this is. That's unAmerican. And that corrupt clown Whittaker better watch out or his ass will be going to jail. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...