Jump to content

DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal


Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

incredulous-gif-8.gif


Process crimes are a legal fiction.  They can be valid in the investigation of an actual crime, if the individuals in question lie to the FBI to hamper the investigation into a crime.  However, if the FBI knowingly manufactures “evidence” of a “crime” that they know never existed in order to frame someone for a “criminal act” they knew never occurred in the first place?

 

Well that’s something else entirely.

 

Something that happens under tin pot third world dictatorships.

  • Thank you (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:


Process crimes are a legal fiction.  They can be valid in the investigation of an actual crime, if the individuals in question lie to the FBI to hamper the investigation into a crime.  However, if the FBI knowingly manufactures “evidence” of a “crime” that they know never existed in order to frame someone for a “criminal act” they knew never occurred in the first place?

 

Well that’s something else entirely.

 

Something that happens under tin pot third world dictatorships.

Except that the notion that's what's going on here is a complete fallacy. There were charged by the FBI, unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers and sentenced. Several even plead guilty. The lengths that conservatives will go to in order to accept 0 responsibility and cover up crime knows no bounds. The party of family values indeed.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Except that the notion that's what's going on here is a complete fallacy. There were charged by the FBI, unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers and sentenced. Several even plead guilty.

 

Not a single one of them were charged, let alone convicted of any crimes involving the 2016 election and working with or on Russia's behalf. That's reality. That's not opinion. You can read (but won't) each and every filing, on each and every case, including the charging documents for yourself to see that. 

 

25 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

The lengths that conservatives will go to in order to accept 0 responsibility and cover up crime knows no bounds. The party of family values indeed.

 

And you instantly make it partisan when it's not. Which helps you convince yourself that you don't have to look any further because it's just "a republican thing". It's not. It's about whether or not we live in an actual democratic republic, or merely the illusion of one. You're happy with the illusion, that's clear. But it's still just that.

 

A trick. And they got you. Goooooood. 

******************************

This is new -- and there's a lot here. As always, posting for the link to the primary source documents themselves. 

 

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-emails-suggest-obama-fbi-knew-mccain-leaked-trump-dossier/

 

Judicial Watch: Emails Suggest Obama FBI Knew McCain Leaked Trump Dossier

 

(even more than that is in here)

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BullBuchanan said:

Except that the notion that's what's going on here is a complete fallacy. There were charged by the FBI, unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers and sentenced. Several even plead guilty. The lengths that conservatives will go to in order to accept 0 responsibility and cover up crime knows no bounds. The party of family values indeed.


No one was convicted of anything even remotely related to the purpose of the investigation.

 

And that’s a massive problem.

 

Its a massive problem because the investigation itself was fraudulent.  It was conducted by individuals who knew the accusation was empty because they themselves manufactured the complaint.

 

This was done for the purpose of backwards engineering a crime, any crime, so they could pin it on the President in order to remove him from office.

 

That is absolutely terrifying.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

?

Has been laughably wrong on this topic for 4 years. Rather than learn from his errors, or admit to them, he’d rather laugh and defend the indefensible. 
 

Why? 
 

Because he’s a bad person that fights for pedos and encourages a rogue FBI and USIC just so he can feel better about his own ignorance. 
 

Don’t be like Gary. Be better than a man who stands up to be counted with everything this country was meant to oppose. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

?

Wrong about every position he’s taken on this matter. He won’t admit it — but he will go out of his way to defend the indefensible at every turn, whether that be FBI agents who break the law for partisan reasons (Gary loves that) or pedos around the world trafficking kids for their own pleasure (Gary loves defending that too). 
 

He’s a bad person who would rather live in ignorance, even at the expense of innocent lives, so long as his world view remains unperturbed. 
 

Cowardly. 
Uninformed

And an ally of the worst evil imaginable. 
 

That’s Gary’s legacy in PPP. Remember that when thinking of responding to his screed. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

?

He knows what he’s doing is wrong, that’s why he’s so embarrassed by his own words that he must run from them each and every time. He must shift the topic to the absurd, all to run from his own grotesqueness. 
 

Gary would rather the FBI and USIC get a free pass to do whatever they wish to our civil liberties, so long as his world view doesn’t have to change. That makes him a lousy citizen and even worse hypocrite. 
 

Gary would rather let the child abusers of the worlds continue their evil trade. Hell, Gary will spend hours down here cheering it on by obfuscating those discussions time and time again in an attempt to steer a conversation away from exposure of evil to something less threatening to his world view.
 

Even if that means kids getting hurt in the process 

 

Why?
 

Because Gary is a bad person. He’s the type who’d sit on a corner and watch a child get snatched and then pretend it didn’t happen just so his cognitive dissonance didn’t get bumped. It’s pathetic. Sad. And being complicit with the worst kind of evil on this planet. 
 

He’s bragging about who he is and what he stands for. Remember that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

?

He can’t escape his own words. And rather than defend them, or even apologize for them, he runs away. 
 

Which is what he does with every important topic down here. Why? Because he’s an ally to evil. He’s an ally to those who abuse others. He spends HOURS a day protecting them down here, running interference and disinformation — all to make sure his own cognitive dissonance remains undisturbed. 
 

It’s more than sad. It’s pernicious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:


No one was convicted of anything even remotely related to the purpose of the investigation.

 

And that’s a massive problem.

 

Its a massive problem because the investigation itself was fraudulent.  It was conducted by individuals who knew the accusation was empty because they themselves manufactured the complaint.

 

This was done for the purpose of backwards engineering a crime, any crime, so they could pin it on the President in order to remove him from office.

 

That is absolutely terrifying.

Again what you and the slow zoo animal don't want to accept is that the FBI got them on what was a slam dunk case. You seem like the kind of person that believes Al Capone wasn't a gangster because they only got him on Tax Evasion charges. OJ was innocent too, only financially liable. Laughable the lengths you party hacks will go to to support party over country.

7 minutes ago, Warren Zevon said:

 

Who funds The Federalist?

That's the question

Edited by BullBuchanan
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Again what you and the slow zoo animal don't want to accept is that the FBI got them on what was a slam dunk case. You seem like the kind of person that believes because Al Capone wasn't a gangster because they only got on Tax Evasion charges. OJ was innocent too. Laughable the lengths you party hacks will go to to support party over country.


The FBI did not get them “on a slam dunk case”.

 

The government doesn’t get to knowingly accuse it’s citizens falsely of fake crimes, and then “investigate” those fake crimes in order to turn up dirt, real crimes, or even worse process crimes related to the origional sham investigation.

 

That’s highly illegal.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...