Jump to content

DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Chandemonium said:

Looks like the folks at The Onion have been reading @Deranged Rhino‘s threads about Mueller and the Deep State:

 

https://politics.theonion.com/white-house-says-mueller-report-must-be-kept-private-be-1833813865

 

 


The last few years have been so *****-up it has been very difficult to recognize The Onion as parody. 

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chandemonium said:

Looks like the folks at The Onion have been reading @Deranged Rhino‘s threads about Mueller and the Deep State:

 

https://politics.theonion.com/white-house-says-mueller-report-must-be-kept-private-be-1833813865

 

 

 

From the article:

Quote

would be reduced to “gibbering idiots,” foaming at the mouth

 

Too late.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

 

(thread)

 

 

That's funny! 

 

Just show the American people the report and we won't have to rely on annonomous sourcing 

3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

(over obstruction - not collusion/conspiracy... which makes it entirely irrelevant)

No, not at all. Obstruction of justice is a crime. 

 

And if the obstruction hurt the probe, or hindered it from finding the conspiracy, then it is especially important to know that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

That's funny! 

 

Just show the American people the report and we won't have to rely on annonomous sourcing 

No, not at all. Obstruction of justice is a crime. 

 

And if the obstruction hurt the probe, or hindered it from finding the conspiracy, then it is especially important to know that. 

How can you obstruct something that never happened?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, westside said:

How can you obstruct something that never happened?

 

Martha Stewart found out and served time for it.

 

there never was a crime but you didn’t meet patently outrageous demands during the investigation, so you are guilty

 

(see, Kafkaesque)

 

 

 

 

16 minutes ago, westside said:

Why would they obstruct a investigation when they knew they never colluded?

 

Just fall off the turnip truck, Sport?

Edited by row_33
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, row_33 said:

 

Martha Stewart found out and served time for it.

 

there never was a crime but you didn’t meet patently outrageous demands during the investigation, so you are guilty

 

(see, Kafkaesque)

 

 

 

 

 

Just fall off the turnip truck, Sport?

I'm replying to tibs. So I have talk to him like you would a 2 year old.

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Maybe they were conspiring with the Russians and trying to hide it. 

 

We we need to see the report. 

Was Mueller conspiring with the Russians as well? After two years and thousands of information collected, he didn't find any collusion?

He came out and said no collusion. Do you know something Mueller doesn't know? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, westside said:

I'm replying to tibs. So I have talk to him like you would a 2 year old.

Was Mueller conspiring with the Russians as well? After two years and thousands of information collected, he didn't find any collusion?

He came out and said no collusion. Do you know something Mueller doesn't know? 

Let's see the report then. They are hiding something. 

 

Yes, I know the report isn't being released. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...