Jump to content

Trump foreign policy


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ALF said:

 

What is the YPG in the agreement ?

 

What Kurdish military lost 11,000 lives helping the US defeat ISIS ?

 

The same I mentioned two weeks ago.  It's the militant arm of the PKK in Syria.  It's "homegrown" the same way the Provos were "homegrown" from Sinn Fein and the IRA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

Romney, 72, expressed frustration that the U.S. had caved to Turkey's demands, asking, "Are we so weak and so inept diplomatically that Turkey forced the hand of the United States of America? Turkey?"

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/mitt-romney-on-turkey-cease-fire-american-honor-has-already-been-tarnished

Kinda funny Romney accusing anyone or anything of being weak. That guy is so wimpy you would almost think he's related to black face Justin T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TH3 said:

So in short order we should pull out of South Korea, Japan, Germany, Poland too right? 

 

I mean we gotta be consistent....while we are at it....i mean we have been concerned with Israel for 70 years....they can do their own thing too....

 

Sick of paying for those bases!

 

,,,because factions in those countries have been warring and killing each other for years, right?......great comparison................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hedge said:

 

 

 

Worst. Warmonger. Ever.

2 hours ago, ALF said:

What Kurdish military lost 11,000 lives helping the US defeat ISIS ?

 

Was that Kurdish "military" helping us defeat ISIS out of the kindness of their hearts, or because ISIS was trying to conquer/kill their people?

 

You know, there is a bit of a difference.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Dante said:

Kinda funny Romney accusing anyone or anything of being weak. That guy is so wimpy you would almost think he's related to black face Justin T.

 

Hey now, don't forget that Romney gave some chick cancer, and that he owns a horse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, GG said:

 

You don’t see the contradiction of crying about Iran to the UN, but effectively strengthening Iran’s position on the ground?

No, I don’t. These issues are extraordinarily complex. In this case the Administration’s policies are consistent: they are getting the United States military forces out of the region while asking the UN to do its job so we won’t end up having to return any time soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

No, I don’t. These issues are extraordinarily complex. In this case the Administration’s policies are consistent: they are getting the United States military forces out of the region while asking the UN to do its job so we won’t end up having to return any time soon.

 

That's an excuse.  UN is a feckless organization that Trump has railed on forever. 

 

Actions matter much more than words.  This was an awful two weeks for Trump's foreign "policy"   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GG said:

 

That's an excuse.  UN is a feckless organization that Trump has railed on forever. 

 

Actions matter much more than words.  This was an awful two weeks for Trump's foreign "policy"   


Or part of a grand master plan according to some with information on the ground.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bottom has dropped out of Republican support for inane policy decisions. “Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a vocal critic of President Donald Trump’s decision to pull US troops from Syria, said Thursday he wants the Senate to pass a resolution condemning the move that is ‘even stronger’ than the one that passed the House Wednesday with a broad bipartisan vote.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem that the Republicans have is that they have never been able to just fall in line. They have different opinions and aren't willing to let those opinions slide just for the sake of party unity. The Democrats on the other hand, march lock-step with party leadership (The Squad aside) and would follow party leadership off a cliff if lead there. The Republicans will never succumb to the lure of the lemming leaders, but will unite behind dynamic leadership while simultaneously objecting when they see fit. It's like Republicans are The Marlboro Man while Democrats seek out Virginia Slims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...