/dev/null Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Agreed. It makes no sense to me so I don't put much stock into it, but figured I'd share it in case it did make sense to those with more experience dealing with clearances and what's required. My guess is HRC does not want to subject herself to a Background Investigation that could expose her dealings at the State Department 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 34 minutes ago, /dev/null said: How would it make her more difficult to track? It's not like they RFID tag people with a clearance. Bill and HRC are two of the most recognizable faces on the planet. Include their entourage and the requirements of their lavish lifestyles, and they will be easy to track 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Sorry, I meant if she tried to flee the country. Not run for office. I should have been more clear. You'd think her Secret Service detail would be easier to track. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 20 minutes ago, Koko78 said: You'd think her Secret Service detail would be easier to track. In the unlikely event the Clintons ever made a run for it, I think they would be smart enough to not bring Federal law enforcement officers along with them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 Just now, /dev/null said: In the unlikely event the Clintons ever made a run for it, I think they would be smart enough to not bring Federal law enforcement officers along with them Are you sure? They're pretty arrogant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I have had a crazy past 48 hours and haven't really gotten a chance to do much digging myself into this topic - but I heard one thing I wanted to float out there to the group because it made little sense to me. A friend told me they believe dropping her clearance makes Clinton harder to track if she were to make a run for it - which sounds shaky to me, but who knows... It makes no sense whatsoever. Given that she's got a full-time Secret Service escort for life, she's already tracked 24/7. When she ditches them, then she might be making a run for it. But she won't go on the lamb...because that would mean she did something wrong. Persecution by the "great right-wing conspiracy" is a deep-seated part of her identity; she'd sooner stay, face that, and reinforce her perception of herself than run and deny it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: It makes no sense whatsoever. Given that she's got a full-time Secret Service escort for life, she's already tracked 24/7. When she ditches them, then she might be making a run for it. But she won't go on the lamb...because that would mean she did something wrong. Persecution by the "great right-wing conspiracy" is a deep-seated part of her identity; she'd sooner stay, face that, and reinforce her perception of herself than run and deny it. But what if they have footage of her eating children? ? Edited October 14, 2018 by OJ Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 4 minutes ago, OJ Tom said: But what if they have footage of her eating children? ? Well, before it could be released, the owner of said footage got really depressed. Suicidal even. They did not seek help, and shot themselves in the back of the head twice, and once through the heart, for good measure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Koko78 said: Well, before it could be released, the owner of said footage got really depressed. Suicidal even. They did not seek help, and shot themselves in the back of the head twice, and once through the heart, for good measure. Yep, that's what I've heard. She better put a full tank of gas in it, before she gets on her lamb, anyway. Edited October 14, 2018 by OJ Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 2 hours ago, OJ Tom said: But what if they have footage of her eating children? ? Not her fault. It takes a village, after all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 . 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 Maybe the Clintons will take up residence on the Isle of Elba. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 15, 2018 Author Share Posted October 15, 2018 53 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Once the Party of slavery, always the Party of slavery. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 16 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I agree with her, for once. Imbalance of power is not de facto abuse of power, and I don't recall a single thing in the Starr report that so much as implied that Lewinsky was denied agency in any way. To say Lewinsky was a victim of Bill's in any way is SJW bull ****. Lewinsky was more victimized by Linda Tripp than Clinton. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 41 minutes ago, DC Tom said: I agree with her, for once. Imbalance of power is not de facto abuse of power, and I don't recall a single thing in the Starr report that so much as implied that Lewinsky was denied agency in any way. To say Lewinsky was a victim of Bill's in any way is SJW bull ****. Lewinsky was more victimized by Linda Tripp than Clinton. If Monica had not followed Linda's advice to keep the dress, she'd be in jail, dead, or in an insane asylum today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: I agree with her, for once. Imbalance of power is not de facto abuse of power, and I don't recall a single thing in the Starr report that so much as implied that Lewinsky was denied agency in any way. To say Lewinsky was a victim of Bill's in any way is SJW bull ****. Lewinsky was more victimized by Linda Tripp than Clinton. Your HR department would like a word with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 Just now, Joe Miner said: Your HR department would like a word with you. Because HR departments aren't full of SJW bull **** themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 Shes back ...!!! How Hillary Clinton could win in 2020 http://theweek.com/articles/801606/how-hillary-clinton-could-win-2020 Wait...its a liberal rag web page, bearded leftist dude fantasizing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 16 minutes ago, Albwan said: Shes back ...!!! How Hillary Clinton could win in 2020 http://theweek.com/articles/801606/how-hillary-clinton-could-win-2020 Wait...its a liberal rag web page, bearded leftist dude fantasizing... Hmm... I thought it was a good read. It wasn't exactly complimentary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts