Jump to content

Alex Smith compared to Matt Moore


Recommended Posts

Here is something I would like opinions on.......

 

How would you compare the talent level of Alex Smith to Matt Moore.......

 

Now....there has to be some difference one is a starter and the other one is not

 

Just food for thought though....Greg Roman seemed to fix what was wrong with Alex Smith and he has gone on to be a competant starter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Alex Smith was a #1 overall pick.

 

Matt Moore was undrafted.

 

One of these things is easier to "fix" than the other

There both white?

 

We should be comparing Matt moore to Josh McCown. That's more of the same league. In the little time Moore has played he already has had a few season ending injuries. Smith is a much smarter game manager (if that's what you want out of Moore) who is accurate and doesn't throw interceptions. Moore has close to a 50/50 TD/INT rate.

 

As the individual pointed out above the sample size is so small as well it is impossible to predict but it points to him not being a very good QB.

Edited by BuffaloBillsForever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is no comparison. Alex Smith was a highly recruited former #1 pick with a ton of talent. Matt Moore is not as talented but has been a competent backup. Matt Moore has already reached his potential, there is not untapped potential in there like with Alex Smith. maybe you can use that comparison on someone like Sanchez who was a former top 5 pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably meaningless but my lasting impression of him is from Hard knocks in Tannehill's rookie year, when he was told shortly before a preseason game he was starting. He seemed surprised and like "oh sh*t" - like he wasn't prepared. Lol.

:doh::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alex Smith will not throw the football down field which is why the chiefs can't win games late. There "2 minute" offense consist of 9 handoffs to Charles- there was discussion of cutting Smith prior to the March date of his new contract kicking in. The back up Chase Daniels has done a nice impression of Smith when given the chance to play but he's a back up making 4.8 million so if they stick with Alex Chase will be cut loose (ha). Murray is there 3rd stringer for now. Bottom line is Smith is really no better than 90% of the free agents currently available IF you have the good defense, good oline and a power running game he can be affective. It's the ingredients a lot of teams play on - you will beat the bad teams and most of the teams your better than gets you to 9-7 if the schedule smiles on you 10-6 playoffs are usually possible but it's a one and out. A loaded defense like Seattle and you get the kiss hello super bowl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where these guys were drafted makes no difference to me. I've long opined that Matt Moore has been the best Dolphins QB since he's been there. I consider Alex Smith to be better than Moore, but simply because he's had the chance to prove it. I'd love to be able to get Moore in Buffalo to join the competition.

Edited by Gugny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they're different in style of play, Smith is a more a like a game manager, he takes care of the ball and he's a great athlete, hence you can design some plays to hurt teams with his legs. He's not a great intermediate passer, so his game is based on short passes, misdirection and lots of YAC.

 

Moore is more like a gunslinger, his play is more vertical than Smith's but I don't know if he can be the guy for 16 games. There's no much data to form an opinion. Would he be a great back-up? Sure, don't know if he would be a capable starter for a long stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do we always expect that the new QB coach / OC can fix a QB? That somehow his style of coaching or new type of offense will make an iota of a difference?

 

It hasn't happened here in 15 years. We've probably had more than a dozen QB's and even more QB coaches and OC's. Promises of the QB will fit the style, we will use the QBs strengths, we will improve the line / run game and they will turn into winners, the QB can run, the QB will stay in the pocket, the QB just needs to throw it away and go on to the next play, "we will dictate to the defense" is always a good one, on and on and on....

 

The truth in fact is that the QB usually regresses. But every off-season we drink new Kool-Aid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do we always expect that the new QB coach / OC can fix a QB? That somehow his style of coaching or new type of offense will make an iota of a difference?

 

It hasn't happened here in 15 years. We've probably had more than a dozen QB's and even more QB coaches and OC's. Promises of the QB will fit the style, we will use the QBs strengths, we will improve the line / run game and they will turn into winners, the QB can run, the QB will stay in the pocket, the QB just needs to throw it away and go on to the next play, "we will dictate to the defense" is always a good one, on and on and on....

 

The truth in fact is that the QB usually regresses. But every off-season we drink new Kool-Aid.

It didnt happen here....it happened in San Fran. And we just aquired the OC of San Fran

 

Alex Smith was considered a total bust at one point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alex Smith will not throw the football down field which is why the chiefs can't win games late. There "2 minute" offense consist of 9 handoffs to Charles- there was discussion of cutting Smith prior to the March date of his new contract kicking in. The back up Chase Daniels has done a nice impression of Smith when given the chance to play but he's a back up making 4.8 million so if they stick with Alex Chase will be cut loose (ha). Murray is there 3rd stringer for now. Bottom line is Smith is really no better than 90% of the free agents currently available IF you have the good defense, good oline and a power running game he can be affective. It's the ingredients a lot of teams play on - you will beat the bad teams and most of the teams your better than gets you to 9-7 if the schedule smiles on you 10-6 playoffs are usually possible but it's a one and out. A loaded defense like Seattle and you get the kiss hello super bowl

 

 

The Chiefs lose games becasue their HC is a ntoriously bad in-game manager. He's a total clown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...