Jump to content

What is better, no guns, or more guns?


Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

For this guy I think no guns are better:

 

Wonder how many teeth he lost on that shot. I hope he got back at it and fired the rest of the magazine. He needs the practice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LeviF91 said:

 

God created man.  Samuel Colt made men equal.

 

And that's nice and all, too bad Raygun was a gun-grabbing phony.

How would you know that? They don't even have the internet in Wasilla.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OREGON: Clerk fired after pulling gun on hatchet-bearing attacker, causing attacker to flee.

A hearty “Well done” and “Stout fellow!” are due the clerk. With well-disciplined use of the pistol, he defended his own life — surely the Plaid Pantry’s first consideration — while preventing the confrontation from escalating or bringing harm to anyone else. He managed to notify the police, and he didn’t make the error of trying to pursue the attempted robber. For good measure, the would-be robber took off without his hatchet, leaving it on the counter, so he was disarmed at that point too.

 

The clerk is now out of a job, however.

 

The president of Plaid Pantry told KOIN 6 News the stores have a zero tolerance for weapons and the clerk is no longer employed there. He said employees are trained to de-escalate robbery situations to avoid injury.

 

Granted, if the clerk knew about the “zero tolerance policy for weapons,” he shouldn’t have had a weapon in the store. (He probably shouldn’t have accepted employment there in the first place.)

 

But what an indictment it is of zero tolerance policies for weapons, that the clerk would have had no way to bring off the same very happy outcome if he hadn’t been armed himself.

Read the whole thing.

 

 

.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

OREGON: Clerk fired after pulling gun on hatchet-bearing attacker, causing attacker to flee.

A hearty “Well done” and “Stout fellow!” are due the clerk. With well-disciplined use of the pistol, he defended his own life — surely the Plaid Pantry’s first consideration — while preventing the confrontation from escalating or bringing harm to anyone else. He managed to notify the police, and he didn’t make the error of trying to pursue the attempted robber. For good measure, the would-be robber took off without his hatchet, leaving it on the counter, so he was disarmed at that point too.

 

The clerk is now out of a job, however.

 

The president of Plaid Pantry told KOIN 6 News the stores have a zero tolerance for weapons and the clerk is no longer employed there. He said employees are trained to de-escalate robbery situations to avoid injury.

 

Granted, if the clerk knew about the “zero tolerance policy for weapons,” he shouldn’t have had a weapon in the store. (He probably shouldn’t have accepted employment there in the first place.)

 

But what an indictment it is of zero tolerance policies for weapons, that the clerk would have had no way to bring off the same very happy outcome if he hadn’t been armed himself.

Read the whole thing.

 

 

.

 

 

So, the president of that chain thinks advertising that they are easy targets for armed robberies is a good thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

So, the president of that chain thinks advertising that they are easy targets for armed robberies is a good thing?

 

not a shred of thinking at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

He said employees are trained to de-escalate robbery situations to avoid injury.

 

 

I thought that is exactly what happened. Clerk pulls out gun. Robber shat himself. Situation de-escalated.

Edited by KRC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

So, the president of that chain thinks advertising that they are easy targets for armed robberies is a good thing?

 

yes, offer a cup of cocoa and some pajamas and reason with the man in a frenzy pointing a gun at you

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

I thought that is exactly what happened. Clerk pulls out gun. Robber shat himself. Situation de-escalated.

 

Yep.  Often, the only way to de-escalate a situation is a demonstrate a superior level of force.  Si vis pacem, para bellum.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LeviF91 said:

 

Yep.  Often, the only way to de-escalate a situation is a demonstrate a superior level of force.  Si vis pacem, para bellum.

 

that can be very effective, the demo can be demoed by taking out the perp with full prejudice

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LeviF91 said:

 

Yep.  Often, the only way to de-escalate a situation is a demonstrate a superior level of force.  Si vis pacem, para bellum.

 

Literally just had to do this, sans gun.

 

(*^*&%^$^#mouthing off to blind woman in the Metro station.  I believe my exact words were "knock you in to next week and kick your ass on Tuesday."

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...