Jump to content

The Affordable Care Act II - Because Mr. Obama Loves You All


Recommended Posts

The Little Sister's of the Poor won again.  The Court has upheld the exemptions from the ACA's birth-control mandate for private employers with religious and moral objections.

This case is a challenge to the 2017 rules issued by the Trump administration that expanded the exemption from Affordable Care Act’s birth-control mandate, which generally requires employers to provide their female employees with health insurance that includes access to certain forms of contraceptives. The rules expanded the exemption to allow private employers with religious or moral objections to the mandate to opt out of providing coverage.
 

"We hold that the Departments had the authority to provide exemptions from the regulatory contraceptive requirements for employers with religious and conscientious objections."

 

The vote is 7-2. (Ginsburg has a dissenting opinion, joined by Sotomayor)


 

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
45 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Quick reminder for those (continually) re-writing history.

 

 

 

 

 

Just a reminder......the far left that Biden will most certainly embrace when in office, said that Obamacare was going to fix things......never thought Obamacare fixed anything. 

 

The intent was to break the system completely and go Medicare for all.  People like this should never be given power:

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/26/2020 at 2:45 PM, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

Just refilled my wife's insulin last week.  Still the same price as it has been.  I appreciate the move but wish it wasn't just a symbolic move and wasn't sold with a lie attached (pennies a day before anyone asks).  Insulin cost is a very real issue for millions of Americans.  I won't call it a triumph though until there are actual verifiable results.

 

I did some digging and came across this:

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/09/viral-post-wrongly-ties-cost-drop-to-trumps-prescription-bill/

 

“the administration hasn’t implemented any of the executive orders the President issued in July,” she told us in an email. “There’s a voluntary insulin program that’s going to go into effect next year (which is to say that it isn’t in effect now), but it will only assist a subset of Medicare beneficiaries.”

 

That program begins Jan. 1, 2021, and will apply to “a subset of plans and enrollees, and not all insulin products have to be covered by all participating plans,” according to a Kaiser Family Foundation analysis. It does not affect costs for people who are uninsured or have other coverage.

 

The centers already provide a sliding scale based on income, though, so how much the costs would go down for those recipients depends on how the Department of Health and Human Services ultimately defines “low-income.”

 

and this:

 

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/insulin-pennies-a-day-trump/

 

What's True
Trump issued an executive order in July 2020 that was intended to lower the price of insulin for some Americans.

What's False
Rather than targeting all diabetic patients nationwide, the directive was written to help low-income diabetes patients of certain community clinics, who are uninsured or underinsured, to buy insulin at reduced prices. Also, no verifiable evidence suggests that the lower costs would amount to "pennies a day" for anyone.

What's Undetermined
Exactly how much money some diabetes patients could save on insulin daily as a result of the directive is unknown because the order did not outline specifics, including when or how it would be implemented.

 

So to recap, in regard to the claim in question, it was true to state Trump signed an executive order in July 2020 that aimed to make it easier for low-income diabetic patients to pay for insulin.

But nowhere in the federal document did the presidential administration explain its plan for implementing the change, nor the level to which insulin prices would drop. There was no proof that the order would allow any American to someday pay “pennies a day” on the protein hormone.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
18 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

At Last, Democrats Get Chance to Engineer Obamacare 2.0.

 

 

I was especially fond of the “at last” in the headline to a purportedly straight news item.

 

 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/27/upshot/biden-health-plan-obamacare.html


great. My healthcare got far worse and more expensive after the first round. Can’t wait for the next ‘improvement’.

 

I was an idiot not to buy up all the health insurance and prescription drug companies stock at the time aca was passed. They’ve all skyrocketed. 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

 

Profiles in Courage it ain’t, but for Democrats, it will suffice. The removal of the individual-mandate penalty — the basis for the Supreme Court’s 2012 upholding of ObamaCare — didn’t get resolved in today’s 7-2 Supreme Court dismissal of the challenge. Instead, the court ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the case at all.

 

Call it the easy way out:

 

A seven-justice majority ruled that the plaintiffs had not suffered the sort of direct injury that gave them standing to sue.

 

The court did not reach the larger issues in the case: whether the bulk of the sprawling 2010 health care law, President Barack Obama’s defining domestic legacy, could stand without a provision that initially required most Americans to obtain insurance or pay a penalty.

 

https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2021/06/17/breaking-obamacare-wins-the-scotus-hat-trick-7-2-on-standing-n397383

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Democrats/Liberals, as usual, were incredibly wrong.

 

FLASHBACK: Top 10 wrong takes from Dems back in October 2020 on Amy Coney Barrett and the ACA

 

https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2021/06/17/flashback-top-10-wrong-takes-from-dems-back-in-october-2020-on-amy-coney-barrett-and-the-aca/


Think Trump and McConnell are pissed in their investments?

 

LMAO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

See, Obama is a lot like Jesus, he heals the sick 

 

23 Jesus went throughout Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, proclaiming the good news of the kingdom, and healing every disease and sickness among the people.

24 News about him spread all over Syria, and people brought to him all who were ill with various diseases, those suffering severe pain, the demon-possessed, those having seizures, and the paralyzed; and he healed them.

25 Large crowds from Galilee, the Decapolis, Jerusalem, Judea and the region across the Jordan followed him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

U.S. Health Insurance Premiums Rise 7%, Near $24K for Family Coverage

 

The average annual cost of employer-sponsored health insurance premiums rose from $7,911 in 2022 to $8,435 in 2023 for coverage of single individuals and from $22,463 to $23,968 for family coverage, according to a new analysis by health research organization KFF based on survey results from a sample of U.S. firms.

This year’s higher premiums come after costs rose 1% for family coverage and 2% for individual coverage from 2021 to 2022

 

But its funny and predictable how the statist above is mentioning OBAMA and Jesus in the same sentence.

 

SMH

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tommy Callahan said:

U.S. Health Insurance Premiums Rise 7%, Near $24K for Family Coverage

 

The average annual cost of employer-sponsored health insurance premiums rose from $7,911 in 2022 to $8,435 in 2023 for coverage of single individuals and from $22,463 to $23,968 for family coverage, according to a new analysis by health research organization KFF based on survey results from a sample of U.S. firms.

This year’s higher premiums come after costs rose 1% for family coverage and 2% for individual coverage from 2021 to 2022

 

But its funny and predictable how the statist above is mentioning OBAMA and Jesus in the same sentence.

 

SMH

 

 

 

 

Joe says         bg,f8f8f8-flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Joe says         bg,f8f8f8-flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f

.

Mathew 13 

 13 Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand.

14 In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah: “ ‘You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

.

Mathew 13 

 13 Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand.

14 In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah: “ ‘You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.

Leviticus 19:11-13 English Standard Version 2016 (ESV)“You shall not steal; you shall not deal falsely; you shall not lie to one another. You shall not swear by my name falsely, and so profane the name of your God: I am the LORD.

 

https://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/12/politifact-lie-of-the-year-if-you-like-your-healthcare-plan-you-can-keep-it-179521

 

It’s almost as if BHO was a false prophet. Sad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...