Geno Smith's Arm Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 (edited) I predict that the offense will suck as bad with Fitz at the helm, as it has with Edwards at the helm (I actually prefer Fitz's suck to Edward's suck, but it isn't really more effective, just different). I also predict that the offense will suck WORSE with Brohm at the helm than with either Edwards or Fitz. I post this to collect in one place, and make easy to find, all the Brohm lovers foolish claims. Stuff about "What is there to lose? and "We don't KNOW that he sucks yet". The coaches know. They see him everyday. I can picture an offense so bad that they will almost exclusively run the ball, and have at least one game without a completion beyond the line of scrimmage. I know this is not news to most, but there seem to be some people that think this change is progress. Edited September 21, 2010 by ThrowIt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notwoz Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Makes perfect sense to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Considering how bad this team is at all positions, saying Fitz won't help is not exactly sticking your neck out. PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotAGuy Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 (edited) I predict that the offense will suck as bad with Fitz at the helm, as it has with Edwards at the helm (I actually prefer Fitz's suck to Edward's suck, but it isn't really more effective, just different). I also predict that the offense will suck WORSE with Brohm at the helm than with either Edwards or Fitz. I post this to collect in one place, and make easy to find, all the Brohm lovers foolish claims. Stuff about "What is there to lose? and "We don't KNOW that he sucks yet". The coaches know. They see him everyday. I can picture an offense so bad that they will almost exclusively run the ball, and have at least one game without a completion beyond the line of scrimmage. I know this is not news to most, but there seem to be some people that think this change is progress. I really think you need to keep your suck preferences to yourself...children may be reading this. Edited September 21, 2010 by WotAGuy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geno Smith's Arm Posted September 21, 2010 Author Share Posted September 21, 2010 Considering how bad this team is at all positions, saying Fitz won't help is not exactly sticking your neck out. PTR Did you read what I wrote? I know YOU understand PTR, but there plenty that seem to think Brohm is this diamond in the rough that just hasn't had a chance to sparkle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 I predict that the offense will suck as bad with Fitz at the helm, as it has with Edwards at the helm (I actually prefer Fitz's suck to Edward's suck, but it isn't really more effective, just different). I also predict that the offense will suck WORSE with Brohm at the helm than with either Edwards or Fitz. I post this to collect in one place, and make easy to find, all the Brohm lovers foolish claims. Stuff about "What is there to lose? and "We don't KNOW that he sucks yet". The coaches know. They see him everyday. I can picture an offense so bad that they will almost exclusively run the ball, and have at least one game without a completion beyond the line of scrimmage. I know this is not news to most, but there seem to be some people that think this change is progress. THROWIT, Despite all of the prognosticators, in all of the newspapers, I think you nailed it. GO JILLS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transient Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Did you read what I wrote? I know YOU understand PTR, but there plenty that seem to think Brohm is this diamond in the rough that just hasn't had a chance to sparkle. Unfortunately, sometimes you gotta put it under the microscope to prove it's cubic zirconia, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T master Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 I predict that the offense will suck as bad with Fitz at the helm, as it has with Edwards at the helm (I actually prefer Fitz's suck to Edward's suck, but it isn't really more effective, just different). I also predict that the offense will suck WORSE with Brohm at the helm than with either Edwards or Fitz. I post this to collect in one place, and make easy to find, all the Brohm lovers foolish claims. Stuff about "What is there to lose? and "We don't KNOW that he sucks yet". The coaches know. They see him everyday. I can picture an offense so bad that they will almost exclusively run the ball, and have at least one game without a completion beyond the line of scrimmage. I know this is not news to most, but there seem to be some people that think this change is progress. I'm so glad we as fans have great football minds such as yours to turn to , to help clarify the things that our puny little minds just don't understand about the game ------- Thank You so Very much i will look forward to your daily post so i know just what way to think about the future of the team ..... Again Thank You !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cynical Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 (edited) I predict that the offense will suck as bad with Fitz at the helm, as it has with Edwards at the helm (I actually prefer Fitz's suck to Edward's suck, but it isn't really more effective, just different). I also predict that the offense will suck WORSE with Brohm at the helm than with either Edwards or Fitz. I post this to collect in one place, and make easy to find, all the Brohm lovers foolish claims. Stuff about "What is there to lose? and "We don't KNOW that he sucks yet". The coaches know. They see him everyday. I can picture an offense so bad that they will almost exclusively run the ball, and have at least one game without a completion beyond the line of scrimmage. The coaches also chose Edwards to be the starter thinking he could do it. Two games in, Edwards has been benched (probably for good). The coaches made choices. Which one was a wrong one? Edited September 21, 2010 by Cynical Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 I predict that the offense will suck as bad with Fitz at the helm, as it has with Edwards at the helm (I actually prefer Fitz's suck to Edward's suck, but it isn't really more effective, just different). I also predict that the offense will suck WORSE with Brohm at the helm than with either Edwards or Fitz. I post this to collect in one place, and make easy to find, all the Brohm lovers foolish claims. Stuff about "What is there to lose? and "We don't KNOW that he sucks yet". The coaches know. They see him everyday. I can picture an offense so bad that they will almost exclusively run the ball, and have at least one game without a completion beyond the line of scrimmage. I know this is not news to most, but there seem to be some people that think this change is progress. Would these be the same coaches that went all off season, through training camp, preseason and into the season with Trent Edwards as the #1 QB? Now after 2 weeks of completely inept football, they've concluded what many of us have known for a year... Trent isn't a starter in this league. So, excuse me if I don't have as much confidence as you do in our coaching staff to know who is or is not the best player to start. So far, they've done little to nothing to impress me or show a basic level of competence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpperDeck Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 These coaches gave Edwards every chance to prove he was an NFL quarterback and he failed. So now they are moving on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JK Fan Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Does anybody else wonder what would have happened if TE had completed that screen pass to Freddie, the very first play of the Miami game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DallasBillsFan1 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 I predict that the offense will suck as bad with Fitz at the helm, as it has with Edwards at the helm (I actually prefer Fitz's suck to Edward's suck, but it isn't really more effective, just different). I also predict that the offense will suck WORSE with Brohm at the helm than with either Edwards or Fitz. I post this to collect in one place, and make easy to find, all the Brohm lovers foolish claims. Stuff about "What is there to lose? and "We don't KNOW that he sucks yet". The coaches know. They see him everyday. I can picture an offense so bad that they will almost exclusively run the ball, and have at least one game without a completion beyond the line of scrimmage. I know this is not news to most, but there seem to be some people that think this change is progress. I hear Jeff George still wants to play. The Bills should give him a call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geno Smith's Arm Posted September 21, 2010 Author Share Posted September 21, 2010 I really think you need to keep your suck preferences to yourself...children may be reading this. You know what? Sometimes when I am responding to posts I think to myself "This is probably some 13 year old". If you are indeed serious, I suggest you home school your children The coaches also chose Edwards to be the starter thinking he could do it. Two games in, Edwards has been benched (probably for good). The coaches made choices. Which one was a wrong one? The point is, there is no real choice! Would these be the same coaches that went all off season, through training camp, preseason and into the season with Trent Edwards as the #1 QB? Now after 2 weeks of completely inept football, they've concluded what many of us have known for a year... Trent isn't a starter in this league. So, excuse me if I don't have as much confidence as you do in our coaching staff to know who is or is not the best player to start. So far, they've done little to nothing to impress me or show a basic level of competence. This is the kind of post I was looking for! Does anybody else wonder what would have happened if TE had completed that screen pass to Freddie, the very first play of the Miami game. No These coaches gave Edwards every chance to prove he was an NFL quarterback and he failed. So now they are moving on. Simple as that! And I thought they were grasping for straws.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russ 'Em Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 The coaches also chose Edwards to be the starter thinking he could do it. Two games in, Edwards has been benched (probably for good). The coaches made choices. Which one was a wrong one? +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsObserver Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Does anybody else wonder what would have happened if TE had completed that screen pass to Freddie, the very first play of the Miami game. yes, actually i do. the dude had momentum and confidence in the pre-season and he's the type of guy who needs those 2 intangibles to be successful and without those 2, he's an absolute joke. but ive thought about it - mostly after the first game. that single incompletion deflated that pre-season momentum he had and he went RIGHT back to being the 09' trent. but thats the difference between a good nfl qb and a guy like him. he just doesnt have the demeanor needed among many other things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brand J Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 (edited) I don't recall anyone here anointing Brohm as a savior, or the QB of the future. Everyone has acknowledged that he would struggle as a starter. The difference is, he has room to grow and improve. The prior starter has had over 3 years of playing experience at the NFL level and has FAILED to improve. That is fact. Somehow, this fact made its way past Chan Gailey. Actually, I believe Gailey was arrogant enough to think that he could make Trent into a serviceable QB. The argument was such: rather than seeing a veteran continue to fail, why not bring in the young guy, who has at one point enjoyed a level of success (10,000+ yds and 70 TDs at Louisville). I understand that you dislike Brohm as a player, but you have absolutely no reason to hate him just yet. He has not proven to play "Trentative" on the field.. Edited September 21, 2010 by JayBaller10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheChimp Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 I don't recall anyone here anointing Brohm as a savior, or the QB of the future. Everyone has acknowledged that he would struggle as a starter. The difference is, he has room to grow and improve. The prior starter has had over 3 years of playing experience at the NFL level and has FAILED to improve. That is fact. Somehow, this fact made its way past Chan Gailey. Actually, I believe Gailey was arrogant enough to think that he could make Trent into a serviceable QB. The argument was such: rather than seeing a veteran continue to fail, why not bring in the young guy, who has at one point enjoyed a level of success (10,000+ yds and 70 TDs at Louisville). I understand that you dislike Brohm as a player, but you have absolutely no reason to hate him just yet. He has not proven to play "Trentative" on the field.. Nailed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Your statement would be true if the Bills had actually assembled an NFL ready offensive line in front of him. Other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln? These coaches gave Edwards every chance to prove he was an NFL quarterback and he failed. So now they are moving on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJFIVEOH Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 This team isn't any worse than it was last year and Fitz won 5 times as many games as TE. The stats sucked all around, but not the most important one. Just sayin'........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts