Jump to content

delirious

Community Member
  • Posts

    843
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by delirious

  1. This is so delightful to keep reading. After all the homers constantly and vociferously telling us he's good.  *Chef's kiss*, I hope this thread continues, not because of Edmunds, but so the Edmunds Truthers can sit there and be reminded about their homerism lol

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Eyeroll 1
    • Agree 3
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  2. 2 minutes ago, FireChans said:

    Edmunds report update:

     

    Baker was terrified to throw across the middle today. He only threw for 317 yards. If the Scarecrow wasn’t there, he might have had 500.

     

    This has been your weekly update, thanks as always for tuning in.

     

    What a STUD! Can't believe he slipped away from the Bills! 🤣🤣

  3. 37 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:

    the posters on TBD tend to skew older. They want a white LB with a mullet and a neck pad, like it was 1995. Edmunds was a modern LB and was hated here because he is a coverage LB and not Shane Conlin.

     

    Most sane Edmunds mental gymnast

    3 minutes ago, Snappysnackcakes said:

    If you’re gonna put nonsense like this out here, at least spell the name correctly. It’s Shane Conlan. And he would do well in today’s NFL. BTW, he never had a mullet. 

    Right? Shane Conlan would have actually been a beast. Unlike Edmunds.

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 3 hours ago, I am the egg man said:

    Oh yeah? Don’t know what that means, but If it means what I think it does…..you’re eviler.

     

    MWAHAHAHAHAHA! >:]

    54 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

    The Bills need to redo the logo. Both iterations are terrible. Why can't they just do a normal looking aggressive bison?

     

    like the one in this image:

     

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQn3lQAv5mCb6R7MiyYrH9

     

    The current charging buffalo is awesome lol

    • Agree 1
  5. 9 minutes ago, Repulsif said:

    Since we won't change defensive schemes, can we have back at least the red helmet ?

     

    That red helmet Josh wore was MINT. The delusional ones who say it looks ugly are ontologically evil.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Disagree 1
    • Agree 1
  6. Just now, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

    The 1 seed is not something to play with. This defense absolutely sucks. Every time you try and talk about how clueless Fraizer is you get a laundry list of defenders. The guy is a problem and this defense sucks 

     

    The defenders are what's more maddening. Borderline schizos. The evidence is on the screen right in front of their eyes.

  7. Everyone keeps mentioning that it will help Josh see and Tua will be at a disadvantage seeing, which I agree with.  BUT  doesn't that also mean Josh will have a hard time noticing defenders in lanes, and likewise, won't Tua be able to diagnose defenders in lanes easier?

    Just seems like no one really has too much of an advantage over another.  Although, I would much rather my QB have an easier time seeing his receivers than the other team.

    • Like (+1) 3
  8. 27 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said:

    Why wouldn't Dorsey run some designed roll outs with Josh? It could give the option to throw some reverse screens. Dorsey needs to be more creative. Also do away with that inside run where the RB and WR almost collides in one another. Saw it twice yesterday

     

    That sentence scares me for multiple reasons.

     

    1.  If Dorsey need to be more creative then that raises obvious concerns about the Bills' short term success (super bowl this year)
    2. Concerns about long term success - if Dorsey needs to be more creative, what does that say about the other coaches that may have a helping hand in the preparation - for Dorsey?  Specifically Joe Brady, who is supposed to be an up and coming coach.  Does Brady have a helping hand in setting up and designing plays for Dorsey?  Is Dorsey taking full responsibility in play designs?

     

    All questions I have that there aren't open answers to, but I agree with you

  9. 14 minutes ago, SCBills said:


    Brown, Morse, Bates, Saffold RAS are all pretty high, no?

     

    Saffold seems to be a weak link right now.. so I’m sure his score isn’t reflective, but I’m pretty sure every breakdown of our OL cited their athleticism. 

     

    Agreed, they're pretty athletic.

     

    Eric Wood I believe explained the screen game woes while Daboll was our coach.

     

    He (I'm simplifying/paraphrasing) essentially said that it isn't getting practiced enough. Running screens takes a lot of time of practice to get the timing down. He went on to say how much Chan Gailey had them practice screens.

     

    So the lack of screens, on the surface, makes me believe that it's not that the oline can't do it, or that Josh/our backs can't do it. But simply maybe our OCs don't want to devote entire practices to get the timing down.  Or maybe they have some other alternative reason.

     

    Which stinks either way. I think screens would do numbers, especially with Cook and Hines now.

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...