Jump to content

Stank_Nasty

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,438
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Stank_Nasty

  1. 2 minutes ago, Batman1876 said:

    Buffalo is the only fanbase where punter Jerseys are a thing. I for one love it. 

    I was visually distraught for quite some time last offseason when it was rumored schmidt was in a battle with somebody in the offseason. I had just bought the damn thing in 2016..... I guess i'm off the Mayfield train that I've been on since the dude was a friggin sophomore.

  2. 20 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

    and vice versa I will legit angry and disappointed if the Bills do get him on draft day. As I've seen countless former Heisman trophy QBs enter the league and countless of them bust, add to it he's undersized and playing from a spread offense in college screams not NFL QB. Give me Rosen, Darnold or Rudolph (at pick 22) or don't draft a QB in Round 1. 

    right. that's a greeeaatttt reason not to draft a guy..... solid reasoning, bro. 

  3. 1 hour ago, Batman1876 said:

    I have a #6 Colton Schmidt jersey. Baker would render my jersey obsolete so I think he’s a monster. 

    holy crap I didn't think about this..... I too have a schmidtty jersey and have wanted Mayfield all along. how did this get by me? 

  4. 20 minutes ago, grb said:

     

    ShadyBillsFan wants us to know Taylor had three whole games with a QB rating under 45. Aside from forever and again posting Peterman's garbage-time stats against the Saints (and has any stats ever been more garbage-time?), this is Shady's clincher point : Taylor had three whole games with a QB rating under 45. Sounds pretty bad, but you know what's worse? Having an entire season with a qb rating under 45 !!! 

     

    I give you Nate Peterman, 2017 :  24-49,  49%,  252 yds,  5.14 ypa,  2 tds,  21 yds longest completion,   5 int,  38.4 qb rating

     

    You know what's really hilarious? Those numbers include the garbage-time stats Shady is so, so very proud of. Without'em I honestly think Peterman would have had a negative qb rating, if such a thing is mathematically  possible. But the ironies don't stop there. Shady wants us to know Taylor had a QB rating under 40 against Jacksonville. Sounds pretty bad, but you know what's worse? Having a single digit qb rating in the same game !!!

     

    I give you Nate Peterman, 1-3,  33%,  14 yds,  4.67 ypa,  0 tds,  1 int,  9.7 qb rating

     

    Of course, lets be fair : Nate only had four plays - during which he tallied one fumble, one intentional grounding, one interception. 

     

    So here's my question : What the hell did Taylor ever to ShadyBillsFan anyway - to result in such molar-grinding, spittle-spraying, blood-vessel-popping hate ?!?

    My guess? TT either keyed his car, kicked his dog, or stole his gal. It's the only answer which makes sense......

    What’s really priceless is I saw shady say all season qb ratings mean nothing and that Our starting qb over the last 3 years rating is inflated due to style of play.  But then he routinely turns to that stat to pad his argument if it fits his narrative On said player. I’m not even gonna say the players name becuz I’ve kept myself clean of most debates on him since his departure. 

     

    ..... and it feels good. 

  5. 3 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

    everyone agrees with someone every now and then.  

     

    not just he,  but from what I read a lot of people will be unhappy.  

     

    Allen people will be mad if he's not selected and rag on any others 

    Rosen people will be mad if he's not selected and rag on any others 

    Rudolph people will be mad if he's not selected and rag on any others 

    Darnold people will be mad if he's not selected and rag on any others 

    Mayfield people will be mad if he's not selected and rag on any others 

    Lauletta people will be mad if he's not selected and rag on any others 

     

    did I miss any?  

    well i don't disagree with this. i'll just speak for myself here. whomever they deem fit i'll be on board with. the only preference I have is that its a top prospect. I think the FO and coach have shown enough over the last 12 months for me to have confidence they'll do what it takes one way or the other to get the right guy. unlike a lot on here I don't pretend to know more than the guys that get paid to do it.

    • Like (+1) 2
  6. 7 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

    I can hardly wait for the new wave of hate for any QB drafted.    I have already seen the AJ hate.  

    like a pressure cooker waiting to explode 

     

    the winner you were responding to right there is one of the class acts I was referring to..... you don't think he'll turn on a qb in a heart beat? its like dealing with a toddler.

     

    there's no rational conversation to be had when he enters it.

     

     

    as for the topic? there was no conspiracy. it was an awful showing from the qb and an awful showing from the RT that has been horrible for years now.

  7. 5 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

    the level of hate for a rookie is astounding.  

     

    It makes my "hate for Tyrod" look like a minor annoyance on the scale of a paper cut 

     

    I think its more just people pointing out how absolutely stupid it is to say it was any sort of conspiracy and just stating that he sucked..... becuz he did. his career isn't done. he may turn out to be a solid backup. but there is no conspiracy here. he just sucked. and the  o-line sucked vs an elite pass rush. 

     

    mills has been fairly awful for 2 years now. no conspiracy theory needed there. 

     

    and its not surprising in the least that the same people claiming such idiotic things were all the same characters that were routinely irrational and dramatic about taylor throughout the year. i'm not pointing straight at you, i'm just saying in general..... the usual suspects pounced on this one with the quickness.

  8. I thought it was awful in the heat of the moment.... I still don't agree with it. I get it..... but I don't agree with it. I think getting a yd on 4th down was much more reliable than hoping to pin a team deep, relying on a defense that had just got gashed at the end of regulation and then relying on joe webb to make some plays to get them down the field wherever the punt came in at.

     

    but McDermott did more good than bad. so whatever.

  9. 3 minutes ago, The 9 Isles said:

     

     

     

    The Bills getting into the playoffs with multiple layers of help to get them in should not make anyone  proud.  That’s loser talk,

     

     

    What a bunch of garbage. One team did what it needed to over 16 games and the other didn’t. The bills were one of the top 6 teams in the conference that did what needed to be done over the course of 16 games. The ravens weren’t. Maybe we should go back and thank the Steelers for beating them by a point or any other team that beat them for that matter. 

  10. 1 hour ago, #34fan said:

     

     

     It shows that you make bad decisions, have absolutely no

     

    plan, and are completely out of your depth in your field of choice... 

    Can anyone  look at what’s transpired over the last 12 months and come to the conclusion that that summary there is what’s going on in buffalo?

     

    Good lord, dude..... how can’t people grasp that there is more than one model to follow to get the turnaround done. It’s not tank or bust. Thankfully all but 27 poor souls on this board seem to understand that. 

  11. 9 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:

    Without a QB, it is all shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic...

     

    Only made the playoffs because the Ravens D blew coverage on that pass. Being in and quickly out in the playoffs was, yes so great for this team long-term.

     

    Drafting solid players in the draft does nothing for you without the QB. Keeps you exactly where we have been, good enough to win a few games, not bad enough to tank for blue chip QB prospects. Doesn't matter who your HC is; he is this guy

     

    giphy.gif

     

    Browns are much further along than us. Embrace the tear down, dump the players who aren't part of the long-term, get picks, take the cap hit, suck and get high picks in a QB rich draft. Browns grabbed a #1 Pass Rusher last year, are going to draft the top QB Darnold this year and via their trade last year, most likely be able to draft barkely or drop down a few spots to grab some DB help and can easily score another RB other than Barkley (if they chose) in an RB rich draft as well. Next year they will be better than us and most certainly will in 2020....Yeah last season was worth it...

    You literally failed to acknowledge the fact that we ar very likely going to make a move to get a blue chip qb this year in the name of proving a lame point about tanking. Solid move, bro. 

     

    And then there came the dumb-*** ravens comment. Bills finished the season 4-2 and did what they needed to over 16 games. Ravens didn’t. Maybe we should thank the Steelers for beating them by a point a month earlier too. Or any other loss for that matter. It’s sad the things people will say in order to prove bad points.   Don’t people understand how lame they look when they say things like you just said there? 

     

    And as for the browns? What is picking number one gonna have to do with them being better than us next year? Jackson has been very vocal that Taylor is the starter for next season. And you do understand there is more than one qb in this draft right? 

     

    I gotta go to bed. Have a nice evening Mr. Reed83

    • Like (+1) 1
  12. 1 minute ago, SinceThe70s said:

     

    I'm not an advocate of the tank. 

     

    Just wondering if there's an NFL franchise that turned around their fortunes by tanking. The Colts and Luck comes to mind, but he hasn't won a thing. 

    There are all different types of approaches to use as good examples on how teams turned things around. Unfortunately 23 poor souls out of the hundreds of people on this board can’t seem to grasp that concept. 

  13. 9 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:

    What I put stock into is actually being in position to draft the QB and not hope that a bounty of picks is enough to do just that. Had we actually stunk last year, we may have been able to draft another blue chipper with a QB means:

     

    QB+ blue chipper > just QB

     

    Fact of the matter is, the team is being torn down and Hughes & Shady will be moved soon, just as TT and Glenn were. I would have done it all in one shot last year, because you knew Allen was staying, plus you knew Darnold & Rosen were all in the draft this year. So yes, I would have made those moves last year as well...The half measures keep you in the mid round purgatory we have been in for 20+ years...stupid idea

    Right. Huge roster turnover, cap relief, aquiring plenty of picks to make a move and still get a couple of solid players in the draft, all while still making the playoffs with a first year staff is a “stupid idea”. EXACTLY like the last 20 years. Silly me. 

     

    Why havnt I realized the only way to do this is to tank. I think I’m coming around though. 

     

    SMH

  14. 4 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:

    I would have Brownsed it. They are in a better position than us. I said it last year and it's still true...

    giphy.gif

    It starts and ends with QB. Every other position can be moved around interchangeably and found in numerous places. Franchise QBs elevate the team around them....

    And yet you put so much stock into the picks we could have kept.... they have enough picks to make a move for a guy and still have some nice picks.

     

    ...... which you shouldn’t care so much about after talking about how important the qb is. 

     

    Bottom line tanking isn’t the only way to set yourself up for the future and the bills are literally present day proof of that and how they have worked things since last April. It’s odd a very small handful of you really just refuse to see that. 

  15. 1 hour ago, Reed83HOF said:

     

    This will be a fun thread to go back to, especially:

     

    1.) if we puss out on a QB and the Jets and other teams get theirs while we wait for the fall guy....

    2.) if we trade a ****-ton of picks to move up...picks we could have kept btw...

     

    I get the 17 years and the showing of it, blah blah...one and done. The4 focus should have been on the long=term and not the short imo...but what's done is done...

    There’s 2 sides to this ya know? It’ll also be real fun to come back to this if the bills get their man with a smart trade and still have some picks to fill out areas. 

     

    I know the 23 characters that voted “no” have a hard time grasping it but there are other ways of turning a franchise around other than tanking.....mind blowing right? 

     

    But im sure if those said people weren’t happy with a playoff berth with a first year staff after massive roster turnover, aquiring picks to set up a move, and cap relief.... not much would make them happy other than their way or the highway. 

  16. 2 minutes ago, Steptide said:

    I'll say the whole "bills fans are the craziest in the NFL" thing. Yes, we definitely have a passionate fan base. However, every teams fan base is rowdy and drinks too much at games and does dumb things. Especially the smaller market teams.

    I don’t disagree with this to an extent but I’ve taken fans of other teams with me that have frequented their own teams stadium tailgates and that of other teams and each and every single one of them says they’vd Never experienced one like orchard park. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  17. Can’t stand the whole “backed into” the postseason narrative. Going 4-2 to end a season is the opposite of backing into the post season. Bottom line is bills did what they needed over 16 games and the ravens didn’t. 

     

    All the tanking talks make me sick too. Bills made the friggin playoffs all while overhauling the roster, aquiring draft picks to STILL be have a shot a “franchise qb”,  and opening up cap space. That’s called having your cake and eating it too. A certain few can take those tanking remarks and shove them where the sun don’t shine. Sickening 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  18. 4 minutes ago, kdiggz said:

    The goal is to win the Superbowl isn't it? Or do you get a trophy for barely making the playoffs?

    so you are totally disregarding how the bills went about tearing things down to go in a different direction as of last summer. dude, are you trying to be that simple?

     

    I said what I said and you come back with a dumb superbowl comment that has NOTHING to do with it. I hate to break it to you but last year wasn't even close to how others have went and the team, unlike other years, looks like it has a clear direction. for somebody to not be able to see that becuz "superbowl"..... just means they are really just not very smart or have their blinders up and are just being difficult for the sake of it.

×
×
  • Create New...