Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. I don't care to go to 911 again. The owner / manager is a total a-hole. Very rude, and makes you feel like you're totally blassed to be there. I've had many wings just as good or better. See you in space 911!
  3. I thought it was twice the price.
  4. Remember when Obama claimed his administration was scandal-free? Always assume the opposite of what a Democrat politician says is true. Just sayin'. Michael Caputo, one of Trump's earliest advisers from way back when, shared this post after Gabbard released the Obama Russia Hoax bombshell on Friday:
  5. Observers = esteemed barristers Chigoose and Frankish.
  6. The whole D Line needs to get married too now
  7. I’m out. I was simply making the point that those who believe Nixon was framed for Watergate are on the same level as flat earth earthers. But I guess people here will even argue that. And guess who’s in the wrong side of the truth?
  8. The demolition of of Rich stadium will lift the curse. Josh Being Married might get us to the Super Bowl this year. We will need to wait til 2026 season to hoist the trophy. Sorry Gents
  9. Do I think Drumpf wrote it? Maybe. Do I know? Nope. Will we ever find out? We would likely get some definitive proof from discovery if the hyperbolic lawsuit actually moved forward. Will the lawsuit actually give us what we feel entitled to know? Highly unlikely. If the lawsuit proved he wrote it, will he still deny it and therefore his supporters do the same? Of course. That’s the next step in Trump/MAGA 101. Is Trump a pedophile? No. Just like not all Dems are. It’s a tired trope at this point, similar to calling all republicans uneducated inbreds. Will starting 8 new threads about this topic change anyone’s opinion on either side? ***** no. What should happen is the entire file be released. Releasing grand jury testimony is a ridiculous move that Trump knows he’s free and clear in; from an embarrassment perspective (not from a “he’s a pedophile” perspective. That’s the part that makes him look guilty of something (again even if it’s just embarrassing and not illegal). Just release the whole file - not cherry picked parts. And let the chips fall, on both sides.
  10. Hawes will catch 12 balls if that. Not gonna excel in his rookie season. I agree. Coleman will make a leap forward. Im predicting over a 1000 yds recieving and 8-12 tds
  11. You're being an ignorant partisan douche. There were two side to the political spying in the 60/70s; your choice to ignore the one side is intellectually dishonest. I have no time for small minded hacks trying to score imaginary political points. Please acknowledge that politics are two sides of the same coin; they both use the same tactics.
  12. I love the kid but I don't see the top end speed to take it 60 yards like Cook has. He got caught from behind a lot last year.
  13. Not much to understand really.. QAnon folks are weird. Resist Libs are simply the left’s version of them now. “Trump didn’t actually get shot”. “It was a set up by Trump to win the election”. “Actually, the election was stolen and it will all come to light before the inauguration”. “Let’s rearrange letters of words in an alleged Trump/Epstein note”. Y’all and QAnon are just different sides of the same coin.
  14. It was a totally clear night. I remember going outside and looking up at the moon and thinking "There's actually somebody on that right now!"
  15. Your Sunday Clarice............. It’s Bigly Hitting the Fan Week American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman The three biggest stories this week expose judicial hijinks, the willingness of the Wall Street Journal to publish defamatory anti-Trump nonsense in violation of all journalism ethics, and Tulsi Gabbard’s public declassification of material showing how President Obama worked from the moment of Trump’s 2016 election victory on to tar and hamstring him with made-up Russian influence lies. Judicial Malfeasance As usual, the most significant coverage of lefty judiciary hijinks is by Margot Cleveland. She uncovered a memo of a judicial conference in which the notorious D.C. judge James Boasberg confirmed to Chief Justice John Roberts the anti-Trump bias of that lower court, making clear they assumed that Trump would violate their orders. (Indeed, it’s my belief this is the hope of judges who enter preposterously over the top orders -- the hope that wearying of having to repeatedly seek higher court reprieves he will ignore those orders and give the Democrats fuel for yet another impeachment circus.) The Wall Street Journal The Obama-directed RussiaGate Lie MUCH MORE at the link: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/07/it_s_bigly_hitting_the_fan_week.html ,
  16. Was a decent watch but these things feel the same every year now. The ones they used to make in the 90's were incredible
  17. Hoax. You have decided to immerse yourself in it fully. Enjoy!
  18. So, pro Trump conspiracy theory = believable, but anti Trump conspiracy theory = bad? I’m just trying to understand the world of conspiracy theory here. And, it seems a bit, shall we say, odd to reject this particular theory out of hand given the visual evidence of the links between Epstein and Don.
  19. “Watergate was in all likelihood a CIA/FBI frame up of Nixon who won 49 of 50 states” Get in the game dude. This was the quote I responded to.
  20. Like it was yesterday.
  21. Maybe not. Got data that says otherwise?
  22. "One Small Step for Man. One Giant Leap For Mankind."
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...