All Activity

I believe the commentator is correct. This isn’t college football

So helmet to helmet isn’t a penalty because he was a runner? Is that the dumb s h t they are trying to convince me? what in the holy hell gaslight ??

I said they were a good team.. I agree with you

Fixed.

Democrats’ Calls For Violence Are Succeeding As I have written before, I don’t know whether Rahmanullah Lakanwal, who shot two National Guardsmen in Washington, D.C., killing at least one, is 1) a raving lunatic, 2) a devout Muslim–witnesses said that he shouted “Allahu Akbar” as he murdered Americans–or 3) a sucker who fell for Democratic Party talking points. The fact that it is hard to distinguish among these alternatives is revealing. In all likelihood, at least two of the foregoing categories apply. More broadly, we can see that the Democrats’ war on law enforcement is succeeding. It has been focused mostly against America’s immigration laws, which Democrats hate but don’t have the votes to repeal. Democrats have viciously attacked U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, denouncing its agents as a modern-day “Gestapo,” and trying at every turn to interfere with their work. Most recently, Oregon Governor Tina Kotak has threatened to criminally prosecute ICE employees for doing their jobs. As a legal matter, that threat is absurd. But the real threat lies underneath–the threat that people who are deranged and/or unusually loyal to the Democratic Party will be emboldened to try to kill ICE agents. That threat is deadly serious: Assaults on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have skyrocketed 1,150% so far this year compared to the last year of the Biden administration — with nearly 250 attacks recorded since President Trump took office. The disturbing surge comes amid a climate of heightened danger for immigration authorities, including stalking, death threats, online doxxing and outright assaults, which the Department of Homeland Security says is being encouraged by lefty politicians opposed to Trump’s illegal immigration crackdown. That is quite a record–a 1,150% increase. Congratulations, Democrats! https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/11/democrats-calls-for-violence-are-succeeding.php

Ugh.....I hate to even have this thought, but I'm jealous of how big and physical NE is. Vrabel is building what he had in TN, except that he has Maye.

Fixed.

Young? I thought you were talking about a 9 year old. That girl is in her late 20's or 30's.

Fixed.

Pretty much. Damage control for the league.

A conspiracy of stupidity and silence from the broadcast crew as well.

I believe there is a rule about a RB inside the tackles. I can't believe it covers kick returner.

What can I say? All touchdowns are reviewed. I agree it was quick though.

It’s a double secret rule they made up on the spot

“The strike conducted on September 2nd was conducted in self-defense to protect Americans and vital United States interests. The strike was conducted in international waters and in accordance with the law of armed conflict,” Leavitt replied. Let me get this straight. You dont think the Geneva convention applies to armed conflict? Really?

Not saying they’ll be the same in the playoffs but the mark of a good team and one who is well coached is that they win games. And the lesser opponents, they beat handily.

And Ellis just did another cheap shot helmet to helmet. Interesting that this is not a penalty in the NFL but in college it is targeting. There is no way deliberately leading with your helmet to the head of an opposing player should be legal at any level of football.

The rules expert is just there to convince you not to believe your lying eyes.

I think Aikman is happy with the results so far.

That is what they said so it must be true. In college he would have been penalized and probably ejected.

Problem is they have a coaching advantage, and it showed last time

The official NFL Twitter account still hasn't posted a replay of that fumble, which tells you everything you need to know. I'm shocked they didn't call a penalty there. Even if it wasn't intentional they are always calling that.

Refs too. And young hoe betting on himself missing a field goal. Like wtf was that even. He just doubled his 200k salary on the missed field goal prop bet on himself

Did that rules expert say helmet to helmet is OK because the returner was a runner? WTF does that mean? Do they make this stuff up as they go along?