All Activity

They can lose one as long as it’s not to the chargers or Texans. A lot of it is out of their hands if that were to happen

Lots of "ifs" there. I tend to think the Texans may do well against a 1 legged Danny Dimes, but never know. What I do know is I want the teams that own tie breakers over us as far back as possible.

The NFL has zero incentive to reduce games or cut back on international games or stop the Thursday games as they make a ton of money. Simple as that.

How is bama line only 5.5? Someone talk me out of this one, is the qb injured??

I dont care about hockey. But people who do, especially people from the Northeast United States and Canada really overestimate its popularity. Its odd how hockey fans are not able to see why an owner wouldn't sink tons of money into a drowning sport.

As soon as the cops lay a hand on him at a antifa rally he will be uncontrollably sobbing in a fetal position.

Good luck. He accused me pf being a liar and I offered ten thousand dollars if I could not prove what he claimed I lied about. He scurried away like a cockroach.

I admire your attitude. You're probably wrong but you must be very successful in life. I'm serious ...

Agreed. It’s too bad they couldn’t beat Chicago last week as the only positive to a loss tomorrow would’ve been putting them 2 up on Baltimore with 5 to play. 1 up isn’t much to speak of when they still play twice. Knocking the Ravens into the WC group with us already with a tiebreaker over them and KC would’ve been a slight silver lining.

Agree/. All the three RBs need to be involved along with Hawes

They were supposed to resod after the HS WPIAL playoff games two weeks ago. If they did, that Pitt game being played now would be the first time it's been played on since.

Sign me up with the getting rid of the bloody train horns and Mr Brishtside crowd. The song bites and the sound of the train horns have given me PTSD since the drought area.

A loved one who loves another one. Cant help who ya love I guess.

Someone mentioned the rams model. Trade for known stars and get volume for later rounds. That means we would not give extensions to many middle of the road guys like Bernard, Johnson, even Benford. Give the opportunities to the young ones and hope some guys pop, unlike today we have those 10+ million dollar guys taking up roster spots blocking young guys.

What if it was an 18 game regular season, with games every other week? Football almost year round!

Steelers 23 Bills 6

Yup, bad luck…even though it was a bold move. Sometimes you roll the dice and lose

This is such a huge game for the playoff picture. If Buffalo loses this game there’s a very real possibility they won’t get in

Not to worry guys, he’s actually white. Remember this happens over and over and then the left cites these bs stats to defend their disastrous policy decisions.

I think that some people who want to “go bold” will just blame the usual suspects if it doesn’t work out. Going bold tends to mean you sacrificed and mortgaged the future a bit. You have to pick your spots carefully. Diggs worked until he collapsed into Diva mode. Von was a Big Swing, and unfortunately he got injured. We’ll never know what might have happened there, and I fault nobody on that deal. Sometimes that’s just the way it turns out.

So can Xavier Worthy but ask most Chiefs fans think of him.