All Activity

Actually had a conversation today about this with our "head maintenance guy", I simply don't know how else to describe him. He is a smart guy who diagnoses a lot of the problems with our school buildings and solves them, he also has a lot of connections across our country and everything he has told me in the past has happened. Today he was staring that the shrinking of the schools in the blue areas of our county are getting bad because of school choice. People no longer want to send their kids to dangerous schools when they can choose better options. My school is actually growing as are several others in the county but the growth vs shrinkage is crazy to me.

Nancy has lost the plot.

Ok, let me ask you this - Whose OL would you want to start week 1 against Baltimore - Last years version of the Chiefs OL our last years version of our OL? Me, its ours - so better OL as a group IMHO.

Well, 4" schlong will stop posting here any day now that TC is over and Bills season is almost back. Don' cha know, he only posts in politics threads during the off-season.

At least the Bengals are trying something different. Bengals with Joe Burrow being 1-9 in the first 2 weeks of the season is more of a Zac Taylor stat than a Burrow stat. Something hasn't worked, so playing starters in the preseason shows they're trying not to start slow again. If it works, maybe they'll do it more in the future.

No disrespect, but feels like you are really way over analyzing a word here and taking this conversation into things completely unrelated to the post I originally replied or the context of what I actually said (and clarifed). Its all good, agree to disagree on what I meant. Cheers Like I said to the other poster - you are over analyzing a word to be something entirely different than the context I used it to. This is off on some other tangent now from the actual comment I replied to. The point was Shakirs deal was easy to do when he wasn't asking for more than Beane was willing to pay. This isn't complicated Its all good, no biggie and we can just agree to disagree on my context, cheers.

⬆️ Finding! 😂 I'll give you a head start on an upcoming profile: Glenn Simpson. Or maybe Kevin Clinesmith, so you can get your hand waving prepared to explain why an FBI lawyer altering evidence presented to the FISA court is really no big deal.

Sorry, Tarheel. I know all about her now. Love, Frankiepoo “The Guardian understands Flynn and Lokhova remained in email contact, conducted through an unclassified channel. In one email exchange described by Andrew, Flynn signed himself as “General Misha”, Russian for Mike.”

No disrespect, but you cant say in 1 sentence that a Cook deal would be done if his "ask" was reasonable...then try to rationalize why Beanes "reasonable" is taking other considerations into play (which is what i said). Its apples to oranges. A players value is a players value on the open market. I dont disagree with Beanes approach, as I said, about being strongly disciplined in future cap considerations. But what we all dont know, is what is Beanes offer? You say its "reasonable", what # though? This is like that commercial when interviewing for a job and asks how much is the salary...."its competitive". Thats not an answer, and I dont expect you to know Beanes offer. But I do expect you, as a past history of being a level headed poster, of understanding that you cant blanket statement say a deal would be done, if Cooks ask is "reasonable". I think you see what I mean, or hope so now. You are i are saying the exact same, preach on 🙌 Time for people to stop judging this, without knowing what Beane is even offering.

Safe to say his post is BS.

Finding. Only five plus years behind on Russia gate. 😂

Thanks Finding for admitting you have no idea who key Russia hoax players are. Freaking out about RUSSIA!! for years insisting we had a Russian puppet in the WH to now pretending none of it ever happened is, well, reliable.... More profiles coming. Keep stepping on those rakes. 😂 The indictments are coming. No one is above the law. Enjoy!

You cant really dust for vomit.

Can you give edgy another shot? Whatever this is, it’s not cutting it.

Yeah, but he’s all got and bothered about this Svetlana. I think he googled (incognito) “Svetlana Hot Russian.” Now he’s ready to buy $5000 in Best Buy gift cards to help with her legal case. And, you know, maybe meet up some day.

He even drives slow. Kid will be lucky to catch 2 balls this year.

No plans on watching it. Think Sandler is not funny at all. Awful. Add in Kelce, absolutely a no go

I’m no fan of ESPN but what exactly did they do wrong?

From the guys here I was made to understand that all 5 episodes are shown within the span of the one month subscription for $9.99... and then you can cancel the subscription afterwards. So it's pretty affordable and I love the Bills. They're the only sports team I follow anymore. That said, I thought it was too puffy and fluffy and there wasn't much real football meat to consume. On the plus side, the production values are excellent... the camera and audio work is outstanding and it's often a visual feast of blue and red. One might argue that you get to know the players' personalities but I don't really think so. They know they're on camera so they're not really being themselves. It's basically inexpensive eye candy. The highlight package on the other hand was superb. In spite of its length, they showed very few replays which drove home the point that there were a ton of great plays last year... multiple in each game. It reminded me of how grateful I am for this era of Bills football.

I’m thoroughly enjoying the “They Lost the Plot/Yea we got nothing” thread. And seeing Homeloser talk to himself in 16 Epstein threads.

“But catturd” - Frankish

So cool, kid was great. Moment wasn't bigger than him.

My observations from past pre seasons is that our backup QBs have been so underwhelming that none of these fringe WRs have had a decent shot to showcase their skills !!!